Skip to content

Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma in Improving Postoperative Scarring After Cesarean Delivery

Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma in Improving Postoperative Scarring After Cesarean Delivery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06978010
Acronym
PRP06081992
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-05-18
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2025-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Section Wound, Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP), Regenerative Medicine

Keywords

cesarean section wound, Platelet- Rich Plasma, Regenerative Medicine, Wound Healing

Brief summary

Cesarean section often leads to postoperative scarring, which can impact both physical and psychological well-being. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), rich in growth factors, is used in regenerative medicine to promote healing and reduce inflammation.

Detailed description

Background: Cesarean section often leads to postoperative scarring, which can impact both physical and psychological well-being. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), rich in growth factors, is used in regenerative medicine to promote healing and reduce inflammation. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative PRP in accelerating scar healing after cesarean section, using: Six visual scar assessment scales (Manchester, POSAS, Vancouver, VAS, NRS, REEDA) Hematological parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, platelets) Methods: Design: Prospective clinical study, 100 patients undergoing cesarean section with intraoperative PRP. Intervention: 10 ml PRP administered intraoperatively (5 ml before hysterography, 5 ml subcutaneously before skin closure). Assessments: Scar evaluation at day 7 and day 40 post-op using six scar scales; hematological parameters measured at both time points. Statistics: Wilcoxon paired samples test and Pearson correlation.

Interventions

OTHERPlatelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) intraoperatively

Patients receive platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intraoperatively during cesarean section (5 ml before hysterography, 5 ml subcutaneously before skin closure).

Sponsors

Saint Andrew Hospital Constanta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Study Type Interventional Interventional Model Parallel Assignment Number of Arms 2 (PRP Group vs. Placebo/Control Group) Masking (Blinding) Single-blind, Primary Purpose Treatment Allocation Randomized

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients, 18 to 45 years old. Scheduled for elective or emergency cesarean section at the participating center. * Singleton pregnancy (one fetus). Ability to provide written informed consent. Agreement to comply with the study protocol and follow-up visits at day 7 and day 40 postpartum.

Exclusion criteria

* Known coagulation disorders (e.g., thrombocytopenia, hemophilia). Platelet count below 150,000/μL at the time of enrollment. Use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy within 7 days before surgery. Active infection at the surgical site. History of autoimmune diseases affecting wound healing (e.g., lupus, scleroderma). * Known keloid formation tendency (optional: include if you want to exclude high-risk scarring profiles). * Multiple pregnancies (twins, triplets, etc.). Patients participating in another interventional clinical trial could interfere with outcomes. * Inability to follow up for the postoperative evaluations at 7 and 40 days. Refusal to consent or withdrawal of consent at any point

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)up to 40 daysThe Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) POSAS Score Overview: Scale range: Each item is scored from 1 to 10 Minimum total score: 6 (best possible scar) Maximum total score: 60 (worst possible scar) Higher scores indicate worse scar quality Lower scores indicate better scar quality (closer to normal skin)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)up to 40 days0 = No pain 10 = Worst imaginable pain Scoring: The patient marks a point on the line corresponding to their perceived symptom intensity. 0 = no pain/symptom 10 = worst possible pain/symptom Higher scores = worse symptoms
Redness, Erythema, Edema, Ecchymosis, Dischargeup to 40 daysChange in REEDA score (Erythema, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation) as an indicator of inflammation and healing. Total Score Range: Minimum: 0 → Excellent healing Maximum: 15 → Poor healing / possible infection 0-4: Normal or mild changes; generally satisfactory healing 5-7: Moderate impairment; monitor healing 8-15: Significant impairment; possible infection or dehiscence; needs medical attention

Countries

Romania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026