Root Perforation at the Bifurcation Area
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate healing potentiality of MTA and bioceramics materials as a root perforation repair material. The main questions it aims to answer are: is there is a significant difference in healing potentiality of MTA and bioceramics materials as a root perforation repair material? Participants will: enrollment will be from out-patients clinic of endodontic department, faculty of dentistry, Ain Shams university with root perforations. perforation repair will be done using either bio-ceramic or MTA repair material and preoperative or immediate postoperative CBCT and postoperative CBCT will be taken to compare healing.
Interventions
DRUGMTA
Perforation repair using MTA repair material
DRUGBioceramic putty
Perforation repair using Bioceramic repair material
Sponsors
Ain Shams University
Mohamed Salah Elwakeel
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients with root perforation in lower molars. 2. Patients had anon contributory medical history. 3. Patients of age categories between 15 to 50 years old. 4. No sex restriction. 5. Small to medium size perforation.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients with generalized chronic periodontitis. 2. Teeth with difficult isolation. 3. Non restorable teeth. 4. Medically compromised patients. 5. Patients with history of allergies to any of the medications to be used during or after the treatment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Radiographic success in terms of healing | 1 year | Healing outcome: the presence or absence of lesion and its size were obtained by analyzing CBCT of each case and classified into: Cases with complete resolution of lesion considered as Healed, reduction of size considered as Healing, and no size change or increase in lesion size considered as Failure |
| patients with clinical success | 1 year | A successful clinical outcome was defined as follows: no indication of apical periodontitis, no clinical signs and symptoms, and no loss of function. |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed