Accuracy of 3D Slicer Software for Automatic Segmentation Versus Manual Segmentation Using Commercial Software to Evaluate Impacted and Unerupted Maxillary Canine: An Observational Study

Accuracy of the DentalSegmentator Tool in 3D Slicer Software Compared to Manual Segmentation in Romixes Software in the Evaluation of Unerupted and Impacted Maxillary Canine: An Observational Study

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06972797

Enrollment

Registered

2025-05-15

Start date

2025-09-01

Completion date

2026-10-31

Last updated

2025-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted Canines

Brief summary

Our research question will be, can automatic segmentation of maxillary impacted and unerupted canine using DentalSegmentator tool in 3D silcer software be as accurate as manual segmentation?

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

OTHER

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

8 Years to 70 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Age ranges from 8-70y (from 8 to less than15y for unerupted group - from 15 to 70y for impacted group). b. Scans clearly showing unerupted and impacted maxillary canines.

Exclusion criteria

1. Scans with artifacts obscuring the area of interest. 2. Scans with fractures or pathological lesions obscuring the area of interest. 3. Image blurring due to patient movement during acquisition which could interfere with image interpretation.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
3D volume analysis	one year	Automatic segmentation of impacted canine and volumetric measurements

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results