Skip to content

NGS-based Germline and Somatic Genetic Test in Ovarian Carcinoma

Evaluating the Feasibility of NGS-based Germline and Somatic Genetic Testing in Ovarian Carcinoma. The PERSONA-ovary Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06972693
Acronym
PERSONA-Ovary
Enrollment
323
Registered
2025-05-15
Start date
2018-06-12
Completion date
2025-12-30
Last updated
2025-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Ovarian Carcinoma, Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

Brief summary

For patients with ovarian cancer and biologically related diseases, the implementation of genetic testing in the decision-making process could have an impact both on the risk management for the patient and his/her family, but also, more importantly, on the therapeutic management. The identification of genetically predisposed subjects can suggest risk reduction strategies that may involve bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, mastectomy or long-term medical approaches. In the advanced setting, genetic testing may influence the decision for medical therapy (e.g. use of platinum derivatives or PARP inhibitors in patients with BRCAness+ ovarian cancer). The selection of patients for genetic testing has so far been restricted to patients with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer. It is now clear that the strict application of this criterion will result in a substantial number of people with a missed BRCA mutation. Systematic large-scale genetic testing, simultaneously on germline and somatic tissues, is likely to improve decision-making algorithms in ovarian cancer patients. The feasibility of such an approach in the clinical setting, in terms of response times compatible with clinical needs and sensitivity comparable if not superior to single-gene tests, needs to be demonstrated before such diagnostic platforms can be routinely implemented in the diagnostic workflow. This is the aim of the present study.

Interventions

GENETICBRCA testing

BRCA 1 and 2 testing

Sponsors

European Institute of Oncology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

prospective observational study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age 18 or higher 2. has signed informed consent 3. histologically confirmed ovarian cancer, Fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer. 4. Any stage is admitted 5. Any histology is admitted 6. availability of surgical/bioptic material. Formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded or frozen specimens are both allowed, with no time limitation

Exclusion criteria

1\. unable or unwilling to receive genetic counseling

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of clinically relevant mutations in ovarian cancer riskassociated genes3 monthsevaluate prevalence of clinically relevant mutations in ovarian cancer risk associated genes
Percentage of informative specimens3 monthsPercentage of informative specimens
Genetic test turnaround time3 monthsEvaluate Genetic test turnaround time

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of mutational profile across platforms: Devyser vs GerSom for BRC1/BRCA23 monthsComparison of mutation in BRC1/BRCA2 genes between Devyser vs GerSom platform
Incidence of all other mutations3 monthsIncidence of all other mutations
Comparison of mutational profile across platforms: Trusight vs GerSom for all variants covered by both panels3 monthsComparison of all gene mutations between Trusight and GerSom platform
progression-free survival10 yearsprogression-free survival
overall survival10 yearsoverall survival

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026