Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Ovarian Carcinoma, Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma
Conditions
Brief summary
For patients with ovarian cancer and biologically related diseases, the implementation of genetic testing in the decision-making process could have an impact both on the risk management for the patient and his/her family, but also, more importantly, on the therapeutic management. The identification of genetically predisposed subjects can suggest risk reduction strategies that may involve bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, mastectomy or long-term medical approaches. In the advanced setting, genetic testing may influence the decision for medical therapy (e.g. use of platinum derivatives or PARP inhibitors in patients with BRCAness+ ovarian cancer). The selection of patients for genetic testing has so far been restricted to patients with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer. It is now clear that the strict application of this criterion will result in a substantial number of people with a missed BRCA mutation. Systematic large-scale genetic testing, simultaneously on germline and somatic tissues, is likely to improve decision-making algorithms in ovarian cancer patients. The feasibility of such an approach in the clinical setting, in terms of response times compatible with clinical needs and sensitivity comparable if not superior to single-gene tests, needs to be demonstrated before such diagnostic platforms can be routinely implemented in the diagnostic workflow. This is the aim of the present study.
Interventions
BRCA 1 and 2 testing
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
prospective observational study
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. age 18 or higher 2. has signed informed consent 3. histologically confirmed ovarian cancer, Fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer. 4. Any stage is admitted 5. Any histology is admitted 6. availability of surgical/bioptic material. Formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded or frozen specimens are both allowed, with no time limitation
Exclusion criteria
1\. unable or unwilling to receive genetic counseling
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of clinically relevant mutations in ovarian cancer riskassociated genes | 3 months | evaluate prevalence of clinically relevant mutations in ovarian cancer risk associated genes |
| Percentage of informative specimens | 3 months | Percentage of informative specimens |
| Genetic test turnaround time | 3 months | Evaluate Genetic test turnaround time |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of mutational profile across platforms: Devyser vs GerSom for BRC1/BRCA2 | 3 months | Comparison of mutation in BRC1/BRCA2 genes between Devyser vs GerSom platform |
| Incidence of all other mutations | 3 months | Incidence of all other mutations |
| Comparison of mutational profile across platforms: Trusight vs GerSom for all variants covered by both panels | 3 months | Comparison of all gene mutations between Trusight and GerSom platform |
| progression-free survival | 10 years | progression-free survival |
| overall survival | 10 years | overall survival |
Countries
Italy