Skip to content

Videolaryngoscopy at Unanticipated Difficult Airway

Should Videolaryngoscopy Enter Routine Use? Unanticipated Difficult Airway: A Five-Year Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06972394
Enrollment
143
Registered
2025-05-15
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2025-04-01
Last updated
2025-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficult Airway, Videolaryngoscopy

Keywords

Anesthesia, intubation, airway management, laryngoscopy, difficult airway, videolaryngoscopy

Brief summary

Glottic visualization, intubation success, complications and accidental esophageal intubation rate of direct laryngoscopy (DL) and videolaryngoscopy (VL) were compared in patients with UDA.

Detailed description

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University (25-MOBAEK-124). Data were collected by reviewing hospital automation systems, patient records, and difficult airway forms for patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia and experienced unanticipated difficult airway (UDA) between January 2020 and March 2025. Patients with incomplete data, a prior history of difficult airway, or preoperative findings indicating a difficult airway were excluded from the study. Demographic variables-including age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, and ASA scores-as well as airway examination findings such as Mallampati scores and Cormack-Lehane grades, were analyzed. Additionally, intubation methods, instruments used, and challenges encountered during airway management were evaluated. The effects of direct laryngoscopy (DL) and videolaryngoscopy (VL) on glottic visualization, intubation success, and complication rates were also compared. In the relevant clinic, preoperative airway evaluation is performed by assessing the Mallampati classification, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, inter-incisor gap and angle, neck circumference, atlanto-occipital joint mobility, upper lip bite test, retrognathia, prominent upper incisors, high and narrow palate, macroglossia, hoarseness, dyspnea on exertion, and history of difficult airway. In patients without any predictors of difficult airway, routine intubation is performed using DL in the sniffing position. The management of patients with UDA is conducted according to a specific institutional protocol. In appropriate cases where mask ventilation and oxygenation can be maintained, a hyper-angulated C-MAC® D-Blade videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is used as a rescue technique in patients who cannot be intubated using DL. If tracheal intubation cannot be achieved with videolaryngoscopy or other methods and the patient is awakened, and if the surgical procedure still requires general anesthesia, awake intubation using fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is planned.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 to 90 years * Patients with unanticipated difficult airway

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with missing data * Patients with a history of difficult airway * Patients with signs of difficult airway on preoperative evaluation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation successFrom anesthesia induction until the attempt of intubation is completed (peri-induction period).Successful intubation rate with DL or VL in patients with unpredictable difficult airway

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026