Skip to content

Global Postural Re-education in Text Neck Syndrome

Effect of Global Postural Re-education in Individuals With Text Neck Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06972316
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-05-15
Start date
2025-02-09
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2026-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Text Neck Posture

Keywords

Text Neck Syndrome, postural reeducation

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to: Investigate if there was effect of global postural re-education in individuals with text neck syndrome. The Global postural reeducation (GPR) is a series of postures and gentle active movements are performed aimed at stretching shortened muscles, decompressing and aligning joints, with breath¬ing control, contractions of antagonist muscles and sen¬sory integration exercises to work on proprioceptive af¬ferents and re-educate postural control The study was testing the following null hypothesis There was no effect of Global postural in individuals with text neck syndrome.

Detailed description

This study was conducted in the research laboratory section, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of global postural reeducation on neck pain intensity, neck disability craniovertebral angle, shoulder angle, cervical range of motion, and cervical proprioception in individuals with text neck syndrome. This study is a Pre- test post- test single blind randomized controlled trial. • Subjects' selection: A. Participants: 1. 60 Participants from both genders diagnosed by physician as TNS 2. Their age ranging from 18-44 years old 3. Their body mass index ranging from (18-30) Kg/m2 4. Their using mobile phones for more than 3-4 hours per day was assessed by using The Arabic version of the smartphone addiction scale 5. Informed consent (Appendix I) attained from each participant after clarifying the scope and purpose of the research and ensuring them of their right to decline at any time and of the privacy of any information obtained. B- Sample size: The sample size was calculated using the G\*Power software (version 3.0.10). F-test MANOVA within and between interaction effects was selected. Considering a power of 0.80, an α level of 0.05 (2 tailed) and effect size of 0.37; two groups and number of measurements two, a generated sample size of at least 60 subjects,30 subjects per group was required. C. Randomization: Concealed allocation was performed by an independent person who not involved in either recruitment or treatment of the patients. He used individually, sequentially numbered index cards containing the randomly assigned intervention groups (A and B) that folded and placed in sealed, opaque envelopes. the researcher opened the envelope before the 1st session and proceeds with the treatment on the initial examination day according to the group assignment. D. Groups: Participants assigned at random into 2 equal groups. Control group (A) received conventional treatment only. Experimental group (B) received Global postural reeducation in addition to conventional treatment E. Incluction critrria 1. participants aged range from 18-44 years old . 2. participants Body mass index between (18-30) Kg/m2 3. participants using mobile phones for more than 3-4 hours per day assessed by using The Arabic version of the smartphone addiction scale (short version). F. Exclusion criteria The subject excluded if they had the following: (1) history of neck pathology; (2) musculoskeletal disease or anomaly; (3) history of spinal or neck surgery; (4) recent surgery; (5) chronic medical illness; or (6) receipt of any treatment for the neck in the preceding three months.

Interventions

OTHERThe Global postural reeducation

The Global postural reeducation (GPR) is a series of postures and gentle active movements are performed aimed at stretching shortened muscles, decompressing and aligning joints, with breath¬ing contro

Thermotherapy (hot packs) , Dynamic neck exercises, stretching exercise and posture advice

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Randomization was performed using computer-generated numbers placed in opaque sealed envelopes. Participants were assigned to one of two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Allocation was conducted by an author not involved in data collection or treatment. To maintain allocation concealment, envelopes were opened only at the time of participant enrollment. Participants were blinded to their group allocation until study completion.²0 All participants provided written informed consent.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The subject included if they had the following: * diagnosed by physician as text neck syndrome * Using mobile phones for more than 3-4 hours per day * pain score more than 4 on the visual analog scale.

Exclusion criteria

* The subject excluded if they had the following: 1. history of neck pathology; (2) musculoskeletal disease or anomaly; (3) history of spinal or neck surgery; (4) recent surgery; (5) chronic medical illness; or (6) receipt of any treatment for the neck in the preceding three months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain intensity levelBaseline (pre-intervention) and at 4 weeks (post-intervention)assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 100-mm line ranging from "no pain" (0 mm) on the left to "worst pain" (100 mm) on the right. Scores were based on self-reported symptom measures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Craniovertebral angle and shoulder angleBaseline (pre-intervention) and at 4 weeks (post-intervention)Craniovertebral angle (CVA): Is the angle formed between a horizontal line through the spinous process of C7 and a line from the tragus of the ear (Ruivo et al., 2014). angles less than 49° were considered as FHP (Mani et al., 2017). Shoulder angle (SA): is the angle formed at a line between the center of the humerus and spinous process of C7 and the horizontal line through the center of the humerus. SA less than 52° were considered as RSP (Ruivo et al., 2014).

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHeba Heba Saeid Mohamed Ahmed, master

Assist. lecture faculty of physical therapy Cairo university

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 10, 2026