Skip to content

FOllow-up of LOW-acuity Patients After REdirection From a Swiss Emergency Department Using an Electronic TRIage Application

FOllow-Up of LOW-Acuity Patients After REdirection From the Emergency Department at Fribourg Cantonal Hospital in Switzerland Using an Electronic TRIage Application: a Monocentric, Prospective Observational Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06971419
Acronym
FO-LOW-RETRI
Enrollment
450
Registered
2025-05-14
Start date
2025-06-15
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Literacy Level, Low Acuity Patients, Non-urgent Emergencies, Triage

Keywords

Patient Satisfaction, emergency department triage, patient redirection, healthcare system efficiency, Referral and Consultation, electronic decision support tool, patient flow, Emergency overcrowding

Brief summary

Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a growing issue, affecting patient safety, healthcare quality, and hospital efficiency. One strategy to manage low-acuity patients is triage-based redirection, where patients with non-urgent conditions are offered the option to receive care at external medical facilities instead of the ED. This monocentric, prospective observational study will be conducted at Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Switzerland, and evaluates the impact of a new electronic triage and redirection system (Logibec Réorientation). The study compares two triage processes: Current practice - Redirection based on the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale (SETS), limited to low-acuity patients (SETS 4). New practice - Redirection using the Logibec software, allowing redirection of both low-acuity (SETS 4) and semi-urgent (SETS 3) patients based on predefined criteria. The primary objective is to assess whether the new triage-based redirection reduces the number of ED consultations per patient within 48 hours of their initial visit. Secondary outcomes include: Number of consultations in the ED or other medical facilities within 7 days Rate of hospital admissions within 7 days Patient satisfaction with redirection Evolution of health literacy over 6 months Number of ED visits over 6 months Participants are adult patients (≥18 years old) classified as SETS 3-4 and identified as eligible for redirection by the Logibec software. Data will be collected through phone interviews and questionnaires over a 6-month follow-up period. This study aims to improve triage efficiency, patient flow management, and healthcare accessibility, while ensuring patient safety in the redirection process.

Interventions

OTHERintervention is the use of aTriage-Based Patient Redirection Using an Electronic Decision Support Toolin the emergency department (ED)

Name: Logibec Réorientation software-assisted triage and redirection Type: Decision support system for emergency triage Implementation: * Applied during patient triage in the emergency department * Assists in identifying low-acuity (SETS 4) and semi-urgent (SETS 3) patients eligible for redirection * Uses standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria to guide redirection decisions Comparator: Standard nurse-led triage and redirection based only on the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale (SETS) Key Distinction: * The investigated group receives Logibec-assisted triage and redirection. * The comparator group follows traditional nurse-led triage without electronic support, limiting redirection to SETS 4 patients only.

Sponsors

University of Fribourg
CollaboratorOTHER
Hôpital Fribourgeois
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years old * Triage level SETS 3 or SETS 4 (classified as semi-urgent or low-acuity) * Identified as eligible for redirection by the Logibec electronic triage system * Able to speak and read French or German (for informed consent and follow-up) * Provides informed consent: Oral consent at Day 2 and Signed informed consent sent by post after inclusion

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent (e.g., cognitive impairment, language barrier without translation support) * Inability to comply with study procedures, such as: Severe hearing impairment without hearing aids; Acute psychiatric conditions preventing participation; Not available for follow-up phone calls within the next 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Emergency Department Consultations per Patient Within 48 Hours After Initial VisitFrom initial emergency department visit to 48 hours post-visitThis measure refers to the total number of emergency department (ED) visits per patient within 48 hours following their initial presentation to the ED. The first consultation at the ED is counted as the initial visit. 1. Any subsequent unplanned return visits to the ED within 48 hours of the initial visit are included in the count. 2. Data collection is conducted through electronic health records (EHR) review and patient follow-up phone calls. This outcome aims to assess whether electronic triage-assisted redirection is effective, by providing service through alternative health care providers ,without patients needing further ED care

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the number of consultations per patient in the ED or other medical services within 7 days after the first ED visitFrom initial emergency department visit to 7 days post-visit
the proportion of patients who need hospitalization related to initial complaint within 7 daysFrom initial emergency department visit to 7 days post-visit
the proportion of patients satisfied with the redirection processAt day 2 and day 7 post-visitPatient satisfaction as assessed by satisfaction questionnaire
the mean number of ED consultations after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months per patientFrom initial emergency department visit to 6 month post-visit
the evaluation of the health literacy and its evolution within 6 months of visitAt day 7 post-visit and 6 months post-visitHealth literacy as evaluated by EU-HLS-Q16 questionnaire

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactYoucef Guechi, MD
youcef.guechi@h-fr.ch+41263063112
Backup ContactLudovic Galofaro, MD
ludovic.galofaro@unifr.ch+41263063112

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026