Skip to content

LED Application Following Dental Extraction in Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Blue-violet Light Emitting Diode Application Following Dental Extraction in Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants. A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06971081
Acronym
DENT-DOAC
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-05-14
Start date
2023-08-17
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2025-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)

Brief summary

The DENT-DOAC trial is a single-blinded RCT investigating the effectiveness of LED application following dental extractions in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) . The study aims to address a significant clinical challenge, as bleeding following dental extraction is a well-recognized complication in patients taking anticoagulants, and the number of patients taking DOACs requiring dental procedures has increased substantially in recent years. The trial will be conducted at the Eastman Dental Hospital (EDH-UCLH) and will recruit 50 participants who will be randomly divided into two groups of 25 each. The test group will receive both LED light application and haemostatic sponge treatment, while the control group will receive only the haemostatic sponge. The study population will include patients taking DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran) and are scheduled for dental extraction. Exclusion criteria include patients using concomitant antithrombotic drugs, those with known allergy to tranexamic acid, pregnant or breastfeeding females, and those recently involved in other research studies. The trial's primary objective is to assess bleeding outcomes in these patients, with secondary objectives including evaluation of bleeding events (early/delayed; minor/moderate/severe) and analysis of associations between bleeding complications and various factors such as type of DOACs, surgical factors, and patient demographics. The statistical design has been carefully calculated to achieve 90% power to detect both a 50% difference in bleeding events and a 142-second difference in mean bleeding time between groups, with considerations made for a 10% drop-out rate. Patient follow-up will include immediate post-procedure assessment and telephone assessments on days 2 and 7 following the extraction.

Interventions

(Dental Light Cure), LED light at wavelengths of 420-480nm and will be applied for 30 seconds at a distance of 1cm from the extraction site

Sponsors

University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Taking DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran) * Listed for dental extraction at EDH * Willing and able to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

* Using concomitant antithrombotic drugs * Known allergy to tranexamic acid * Pregnant or breastfeeding females * Recent involvement in other research studies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bleeding time(Performed intraoperatively) Immediately after intervention (LED) or control (Local Haemostatic Measures) application until bleeding control is achieved (up to 30 minutes)Time to achieve bleeding control, measured in seconds or minutes, starting from the application of intervention (LED light) or control (standard local measures) until complete cession of visible bleeding at the site. Timing is recorded by a stopwatch
Number of bleeding eventsFrom the application of intervention (LED) or control up to 7 days post-operativelynumber of bleeding events

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026