Skip to content

Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Cortico-cancellous Porcine Bone

Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Cortico-cancellous Collagenic Porcine Bone

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06970184
Enrollment
22
Registered
2025-05-14
Start date
2021-06-15
Completion date
2025-06-01
Last updated
2025-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Implant Therapy, Tooth Extraction Site Healing

Keywords

ARP, tooth extraction, dental implants, porcine bone, collagen

Brief summary

Observational, prospective study conducted on patients requiring tooth extractions followed by ARP and subsequent implant placement.

Detailed description

The primary aim of this study is to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of two different formulations of CCPB used for ARP, and the secondary aim is to evaluate and compare clinical and aesthetic outcomes of dental implants placed in augmented sites. Patients requiring the extraction of an hopeless tooth followed by ARP and subsequent implant placement are considered potentially eligible for the study. At T0, Tooth extractions are performed trying to reduce the surgical trauma as possible. ARP is performed with 2 different combinations of a cortico-cancellous porcine bone with a thermogel (50:50 ratio, hand-mixed or 80:20 ratio, pre-mixed). After 4 months of healing, patients undergo a radiographic examination before implant placement. A T1, Implant site preparation is carried out using a trephine bur (to remove a core biopsy of the bone) followed by conventional osteotomy drills, and bone-level implants are placed. Bone samples are analyzed to evaluate new bone formation, presence of residual graft particles and marrow spaces. Three months after placement, all implants are rehabilitated with screw-retained prosthetic crowns (T2). Follow up is scheduled 1 year after prosthetic loading (T3).

Interventions

PROCEDUREtooth extraction with alveolar ridge preservation

alveolar ridge preservation performed after tooth extraction

PROCEDUREImplant placement

Implant placement

Sponsors

University of Pisa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 yo * Needing tooth extraction followed by ARP and implant-prosthetic rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

* uncontrolled systemic diseases * uncontrolled periodontitis * undergoing previous or actual treatment with medications/radiations potentially impairing hard and soft tissues healing * women during pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histomorphometric characteristics of the bone: Newly formed bone (NB)T1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARPThe primary outcome is evaluated in terms of Percentages of newly formed bone (NB) in the in the histological samples.
Histomorphometric characteristics of the bone: marrow spaces (MS)T1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARPThe primary outcome is evaluated in terms of Percentages of marrow spaces (MS) in the histological samples
Histomorphometric characteristics of the bone: residual graft particles (RP)T1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARPThe primary outcome is evaluated in terms of Percentages of marrow spaces (MS) in the histological samples

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal Bone LevelT1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARPRadiographic marginal bone level (measured in millimeters) taken at the mesial and distal aspect of the implant as the distance from the implant-abutment interface to the most apical bone-implant contact.
Aesthetic outcomesT2= 3 months following implant placementevaluated with the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) according to seven variables: mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar ridge deficiency, soft tissue color, and soft tissue texture. Each variable could have a score ranging between 0 to 2; the total PES has a maximum level of 14
Horizontal alveolar measureDay 1 = tooth extraction + ARPMaximum post-extractive buccal/lingual distance (measured in millimeters) of the socket evaluated with a UNC periodontal probe
Vertical alveolar measureDay 1 = tooth extraction + ARPMean distance (measured in millimeters) between mesial and distal reference points and the alveolar crest measured with a UNC periodontal probe

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026