Malformed Tooth
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to clinically evaluate tooth-supported veneer restorations fabricated using the CAD/CAM process in comparison to conventionally manufactured pressed veneers on anterior teeth and to assess their long-term performance. Survival and success rates of anterior veneer restorations, as well as patient satisfaction, will be evaluated.
Detailed description
Functional and aesthetic complaints caused by congenital malformations and acquired tooth damage are widely spread. Discomfort involves reduced chewing ability, phonetic problems, hypersensitivity and aesthetic impairments. Conventionally fabricated all-ceramic veneer restorations reveal a long history of clinical success in minimally invasive rehabilitation of the anterior dentition. Nevertheless, conventional manufacturing techniques are prone to fabrication mistakes and must be handled by experienced dental technicians and dentists which results in very high fabrication costs. Therefore, access to minimally invasive restorations is currently restricted for most of the patients. Innovative CAD/CAM techniques have revolutionised restorative treatment options over the last decades and have made all-ceramic restorations more affordable for patients. With further improvements of the CAD/CAM milling devices the machinability of high-strength glass ceramic is now possible. The aim of both treatment procedures will be to avoid any extensive additional tooth structure removal, to provide long-term survival and success of the integrated restorations and to improve patient´s satisfaction. Up to now scientific evidence on the clinical performance of CAD/CAM fabricated veneers is very limited. Aim of this trial is to evaluate if the clinical performance of anterior restorations after minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers compared to conventionally fabricated veneers. Functional and aesthetic treatment results will be assessed for five years and evaluated with regard to failure and succes veneer restorations as well as patient satisfaction.
Interventions
PROCEDURELaminate veneer CAD/CAM
Minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers
PROCEDURELaminate Veneer Convetional
Minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers
Sponsors
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients ≥ 18 years of age * Patients that reveal indication for a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 6 anterior veneer restorations
Exclusion criteria
\- Patients that reveal multiple missing teeth, poor oral hygiene, pronounced parafunctions or with allergies to any of the applied materials
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Prosthetic survival time | 5 Years | The primary objective is to compare the prosthetic survival time of the restorations (conventional vs. CAD/CAM veneers). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Prosthetic success | 5 Years | The secondary objectives are to compare the prosthetic success of the restorations (conventional vs. CAD/CAM veneers), the documentation of failures such as fractures and the assessment of patient centered satisfaction. |
Outcome results
None listed