Skip to content

Personalized Normative Feedback to Increase HIV Testing

Personalized Normative Feedback to Increase HIV Testing Among Adults in Rural Uganda

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06969677
Enrollment
1300
Registered
2025-05-14
Start date
2023-11-02
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Stigma, HIV Testing

Keywords

HIV testing, HIV stigma

Brief summary

Randomized trial to measure the effect of personalized normative feedback about local HIV testing rates and local rates of HIV-related stigma on self-reported HIV testing intentions and perceptions about others' HIV testing intentions.

Detailed description

HIV testing is a vital step in identifying and treating HIV. Research in rural Uganda reveals underestimation of community HIV testing rates and overestimation of HIV-related stigma among adults. At the same time, perceived norms (i.e., estimated rates regardless of their accuracy) are associated with personal HIV testing behavior and personal HIV-related attitudes. This study employs a randomized controlled trial to evaluate how providing accurate information about local descriptive (i.e., behavioral) norms and local injunctive (i.e., attitudinal) norms affect HIV testing intentions. Participants are randomly assigned to one of four treatment arms: (1) they are reminded of what they thought community testing rates were in their village and then receive accurate information about high community testing rates, (2) they are reminded of what they thought local stigma rates were in their village and then receive accurate information about positive community perceptions of persons with HIV, (3) they are reminded of what they thought community testing rates and local stigma rates were in their village and then receive both types of accurate normative information, or (4) they are reminded of what they thought community testing rates were in their village and receive no further information (control group). The study assesses how providing this type of personalized normative feedback within cohort-based data collection affects personal reports about getting tested for HIV in the next 12 months and how it affects perceptions about how many men and women in the same village will get tested for HIV in the next 12 months. It is hypothesized that providing accurate information about local community testing rates and/or attitudes toward persons with HIV will increase reported personal willingness to get tested (primary outcome) and improve the accuracy of estimated community testing rates in the future (secondary outcome).

Interventions

Each version of the questionnaire has similar questions about personal HIV testing intentions and perceived norms about other men and women's HIV testing intentions. The content of the prompt presented prior to the questions varies based on treatment arm. This version does not provide any normative feedback information.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Mbarara University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Study participants are randomly assigned to be read prompts with personalized normative feedback information with slight changes in content.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All adults who consider Nyakabare their primary place of residence and who are capable of providing consent

Exclusion criteria

* Minors younger than 18 years of age, with the exception of emancipated minors * Persons who do not consider Nyakabare Parish their primary place of residence, e.g. persons who happen to be visiting Nyakabare at the time of the survey or who own a home in Nyakabare but spend most of their time outside of the parish * Persons with psychosis, neurological damage, acute intoxication, or other cognitive impairment (all of which are determined informally in the field by non-clinical research staff in consultation with a supervisor)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported HIV testing intention in the next 12 monthsBaseline (assessed at the time the survey is administered)Regarding yourself, how likely are you to go get tested for HIV in the next 12 months? (single item)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported perception of HIV testing among men in one's villageBaseline (assessed at the time the survey is administered)How many of these men do you think will go get tested for HIV in the next 12 months? (single item)
Self-reported perception of HIV testing among women in one's villageBaseline (assessed at the time the survey is administered)How many of these women do you think will go get tested for HIV in the next 12 months? Read all response options audibly, except for refuses/do not know. (single item)

Countries

Uganda

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAlexander C Tsai, MD, PhD

Massachusetts General Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 2, 2026