Education
Conditions
Keywords
Patient Advocacy, Ethics, Patient Safety
Brief summary
In this study, the aim is to evaluate the effects of patient advocacy training provided to nurses on their advocacy skills, ethical sensitivity, and patient safety culture level.
Detailed description
This research is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) conducted to investigate the impact of patient advocacy training on nurses by evaluating its effectiveness in increasing nurses' ethical sensitivity and promoting a positive patient safety culture through Bloom's Taxonomy. This study, which will deeply examine the relationship between patient advocacy training, ethical sensitivity, and patient safety culture, aims to provide evidence-based insights that can inform nursing education, training programs, and healthcare policies, ultimately contributing to the improvement of patient outcomes and the overall quality of healthcare delivery.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALmeasuring knowledge level
The study group consists of 70 nurses, each consisting of 35 people. After the routine training of the hospital was given to the control and experimental groups, their consents were obtained and the pre-tests were completed, they were divided into experimental and control groups using simple randomization. The first group of nurses in the control group will not receive any intervention other than the routine training given by the hospital.
OTHEReducational intervention
the effectiveness of training by making measurements after training and comparing them with pre-training results
Sponsors
Selcuk University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Control and intervention group nurses will receive routine training provided by the Hospital Education and Quality Unit. After obtaining informed consent and conducting pre-tests, the 70 nurses forming the study group will be randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups using simple randomization. Subsequently, the intervention group of 35 nurses will receive 8 weeks of training. After the training, both groups will undergo post-tests. The tools used for evaluation are as follows: * Personal Information Form * Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses * Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire * Patient Safety Culture Hospital Questionnaire These tools will be administered and evaluated by a specialist nurse in both groups.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Employees who have no obstacles to participating in the training program
Exclusion criteria
Having worked in the hospital for at least six months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient advocacy scale, Moral sensitivity survey, Patient Safety Culture Hospital Survey | up to 8 weeks | Patient advocacy scale total and sub-dimension scores Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire scale total and sub-dimension scores Evaluation of Patient Safety Culture Hospital Survey is Made Only Based on Positive Response Average Scores |
| Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses, Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (ADA),Hospital Patient Safety Culture Survey (HSOPSC) | up to 8 weeks | Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses (HSO) Consists of 39 items and 7 sub-dimensions.- Scoring: Total score ranges from 39 to 195; higher scores indicate higher level of advocacy * Reliability: Cronbach alpha coefficient 0.95; ranges from 0.82 to 0.92 for sub-dimensions Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (ADA) Consists of 30 items and 6 sub-dimensions,- Scoring: Total score ranges from 30 to 210; lower scores indicate higher ethical sensitivity * Reliability: Cronbach alpha coefficient ranges from 0.82 to 0.84; test-retest correlation coefficient ranges from 0.81 to 0.99 Patient Safety Culture Survey (HSOPSC) * Contains a total of 42 items, assesses patient safety culture in 12 dimensions, Scoring: Each item is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree) Reliability: Validity and reliability studies of the Turkish version have been conducted |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Educational intervention | after 8 weeks | Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses (HSO) Consists of 39 items and 7 sub-dimensions.- Scoring: Total score ranges from 39 to 195; higher scores indicate higher level of advocacy * Reliability: Cronbach alpha coefficient 0.95; ranges from 0.82 to 0.92 for sub-dimensions Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (ADA) Consists of 30 items and 6 sub-dimensions,- Scoring: Total score ranges from 30 to 210; lower scores indicate higher ethical sensitivity * Reliability: Cronbach alpha coefficient ranges from 0.82 to 0.84; test-retest correlation coefficient ranges from 0.81 to 0.99 Patient Safety Culture Survey (HSOPSC) * Contains a total of 42 items, assesses patient safety culture in 12 dimensions, Scoring: Each item is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree) Reliability: Validity and reliability studies of the Turkish version have been conducted |
| Post-tests after 8 weeks of training | 1 month | Pre-tests of Both Groups Comparison of Experimental Group According to Follow-up Times Post-tests of Both Groups Should Also Be Done and Reported |
Contacts
Primary ContactNeslihan Ş Doctoral student, Doctoral student
Backup ContactEmel F Doç.Dr.Emel Filiz, Associate Professor
Outcome results
None listed