Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence-Generated Written Communication for Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients

Artificial Intelligence-Generated Written Communication for Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients - A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06969196
Enrollment
27
Registered
2025-05-13
Start date
2025-07-07
Completion date
2025-10-20
Last updated
2025-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Communication, ICU

Brief summary

Our research group has developed an approach for providing families of ICU patients with daily written summaries of care as a supplement to traditional verbal communication. Written summaries describe the patient's main ICU problems and management plan and are delivered to families each day. Despite the benefits of written communication to both the family and clinician experience, the main barrier to implementing this communication approach is the time required for clinicians to create a written summary. For the proposed pilot study, the investgators will ask ICU clinicians to identify patients and respective families for whom there has been a challenge with communication. The investigators will ask ICU clinicians to edit AI-generated written summaries for content and clarity before they are delivered to families. The investigators hypothesize that this process will acceptable and feasible for ICU clinicians and families.

Interventions

OTHERWritten Communicatoin

ICU clinicians will be asked to edit AI-generated written summaries for content and clarity before they are delivered to families

Sponsors

Rush University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Surrogate Inclusion * One self-identified adult decision maker for an adult medical ICU patient cared for on the 10W ICU * Member of the primary ICU team believes the respective patient will require at least three additional days of ICU care * Member of the primary ICU team has identified at least one communication challenge with the patient's surrogate(s) including but not limited to: 1. Complex medical issues requiring frequent updates to families 2. Complex family dynamics (i.e., multiple involved family members) 3. Increased anxiety/stress of surrogate(s) 4. Difficult to provide updates to family members because they do not visit ICU regularly or are hard to reach by phone Surrogate Exclusion * Surrogate cannot read or understand English * Surrogate is unwilling or unable to participate in study procedures * Patient is decisional and refuses to allow surrogate participation Clinician Inclusion • Advanced practice provider (APP) on the medical ICU team on the 10W ICU Clinician Exclusion • None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Communication Quality (Clinicians)Through study completion, an average of one weekClinician participants will ratings of quality of AI-generated written summaries and whether written summaries address family-specific communication challenges (5-point Likert scale, 1-5 points with higher scores indicating better quality)
Communication Quality (Families/Surrogates)Average one week after enrollmentThe Family Inpatient Communication Survey (FICS) is a 30-item survey measuring of the quality of communication with the treatment team from the perspective of families of hospitalized patients. Items on this survey measure the informational and emotional aspects of communication, and each item of this survey is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree (30-150 points with higher scores indicating better quality communication)
Acceptability of interventionAverage one week after enrollmentAcceptability of the intervention will reflected in adequate enrollment and an average score of at least 3.5 on surveys with 5-point Likert scale measures including the Acceptability of Intervention (AIM), Appropriateness of Intervention (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Survey (FIM) (1-5 point with higher scores being better)
Feasibility of interventionThrough study completion, an average of one weekFeasibility will be determined by written communication being created for at least 80% of all ICU days and less than 5 minutes on average being spent editing each AI-generated summary.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analysis of Individual InterviewsAverage one week after enrollmentIndividual interviews will be conducted by a study investigator using an interview guide Interviews will last approximately 15 minutes. Interviews will be transcribed and coded. Themes identified in qualitative analysis will be used to inform and provide explanations for quantitative results.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026