Skip to content

RCT of Minimalist vs Standard Procedure for LAAC in NVAF Patients

A Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Minimalist Procedure With Standard Procedure for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06969118
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-05-13
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2025-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, General Anesthesia, Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion, Local Anesthesia

Brief summary

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective strategy for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Standard procedure requires general anesthesia, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. With the experience accumulation, LAAC can be successfully completed in many centers under local anesthesia, the guidance of X-ray and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), also known as minimalist procedure. Our center was one of the earliest to carry out minimalist procedure worldwide. At present, expert consensus suggests that minimalist procedure is feasible in experienced centers, but the relevant evidence is insufficient. Some single-arm studies have shown that minimalist procedure is safe and effective. However, there is currently a lack of direct evidence to compare the strengths and weaknesses of these two LAAC procedures. The goal of the study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of minimalist procedure and standard procedure for LAAC in patients with NVAF.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical study designed to compare the safety and efficacy of minimalism transcatheter LAAC versus standard transcatheter LAAC in NVAF patients. The study aims to enroll approximately 200 NVAF patients requiring transcatheter LAAC at 20 to 30 research centers in China. All eligible patients who sign the informed consent form will be randomly assigned to either the minimalism transcatheter LAAC group or the standard transcatheter LAAC group in a 1:1 ratio. The study will record preoperative baseline information and follow-up data at 7 days post-Procedure or discharge, and at 2, 6, and 12 months post-Procedure, to explore the incidence of procedure-related complications and peridevice leak ≤5mm between the two groups.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMinimalism Transcatheter LAAC Group

Patients will undergo transcatheter LAAC under local anesthesia, guided by DSA and TTE, using the WATCHMAN FLX system. The release criteria (PASS: Position, Anchor, Size, Seal) will be confirmed through DSA and TTE.

PROCEDUREStandard Transcatheter LAAC Group

Patients will undergo LAAC under general anesthesia, guided by TEE, using the WATCHMAN FLX system, following the steps outlined in the product manual.

Sponsors

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 - 85 years old, all genders; 2. Subjects who can understand the purpose of the trial, participate voluntarily and sign the informed consent form, and are willing to complete the follow-up according to the protocol requirements; 3. Indications for left atrial appendage closure: non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with CHA2DS2-VAS2 score ≥2 and HAS-BLED score ≥3, or who are unable or unwilling to receive long-term oral anticoagulants; 4. Life expectancy ≥1 year;

Exclusion criteria

1. Preoperative TEE/heart CT/intracardiac ultrasound suggested thrombus in the left atrial appendage/left atrium; 2. Patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine ≥200 μmol/L, creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min); 3. Liver disease patients with coagulation abnormalities and clinically relevant bleeding risks, including liver cirrhosis patients reaching Child Pugh stages B and C; 4. Severely decreased platelet count at baseline: PLT ≤50\*10\^9/L; 5. Patients with severe preoperative cardiac insufficiency (LVEF \<35%; clinical manifestations are uncontrolled class IV heart failure); 6. Combined with other severe cardiac valvular diseases or other structural abnormalities that require surgical treatment on an elective day; or severe coronary heart disease that requires intervention within a fixed period; 7. Patients who have lesions or conditions with a significant risk of major bleeding, such as current or recent gastrointestinal ulcers, malignant tumors with a high risk of bleeding, recent brain or spinal injuries, recent brain, spinal or ophthalmic procedure, recent intracranial hemorrhage, known or suspected esophageal varices, arteriovenous malformations, vascular aneurysms, or major intraspinal or intracerebral vascular malformations; 8. Patients with concurrent diseases (other than atrial fibrillation) that require anticoagulant therapy (such as after mechanical valve replacement, and spontaneous or recurrent venous thromboembolism); 9. Patients who are in clinical trials of other drugs or medical devices and have not completed it yet; 10. Patients who are considered ineligible to participate in the clinical trial by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
primary safety7 days after LAAC procedureOccurrence of a composite endpoint about serious perioperative complications including all-cause death, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, and procedure related complications requiring thoracotomy or endovascular intervention treatment.
primary efficacyFrom LAAC procedure to the end of treatment at 12 monthsOccurrence of successful device implantation under predetermined guidance as well as effective LAA closure with residual leak ≤ 5mm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause death;at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedureOccurrence of all-cause death
Cardiac death;at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedureOccurrence of cardiac death
Device-related thrombosis events;at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedureOccurrence of device-related thrombosis events
Immediate procedure success ratePerioperationThe occurrence rate of successful device implantation under predetermined guidance
The duration of the procedurePerioperationThe duration of the LAAC procedure (minutes)
Stroke/transient ischemic attack and systemic embolismat 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedureOccurrence of stroke/transient ischemic attack and systemic embolism
the amount of radiationPerioperationthe amount of intraoperative radiation (Gy)
hospitalization timePerioperationhospitalization time (days)
The number of replacements of the device.PerioperationThe number of replacements of the device.
All procedure-related complicationsat 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedureOccurrence of all procedure-related complications
Effective LAA closureat 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedureThe occurrence rate of effective LAA closure (residual leak ≤5mm)
the amount of contrast mediumPerioperationthe amount of intraoperative contrast medium (ml)
Bleeding events;at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedureOccurrence of bleeding events

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactDAXIN ZHOU, MD
zhou.daxin@zs-hospital.sh.cn8613801641252
Backup ContactSHIQIANG HOU, MD
hou.shiqiang@zs-hospital.sh.cn8613601836857

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026