Skip to content

Ameliorated Pap Tests and Cervical Cancer Screening Participation

Effects of the Ameliorated Pap Test on Cervical Cancer Screening Participation: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06968871
Enrollment
248
Registered
2025-05-13
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2032-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Cancer Screening, Cervical Cancer Screening Methods

Keywords

Cancer screening participation, Cervical cancer, Multicenter, Multidisciplinary, Pain, Pap smear, Peak-end concept, Preventive medicine, Randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

The Pap test plays a crucial role in the early detection of cervical cancer. A pilot single-center randomized controlled trial applied the peak-end concept and added a non-painful step at the end of Pap smear screening, aimed to reduce recalled pain. However, there is still no multicenter study investigating the effect of the modified Pap test on cervical cancer screening participation. The present project is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to expand the current scope of the peak-end theory into Pap tests and cervical cancer screening participation by adding a non-painful step at the end of Pap smear screening. Our multidisciplinary team (NTUH Pap Study Group) aims to provide innovative, feasible, and low-cost strategies for cervical cancer screening participation.

Detailed description

Participants: This project expects to include women just before they undergo Pap smear screening at the NTUH Healthcare System in 2026. We include eligible women aged 25 or above who have not yet undergone Pap tests in 2026. Excluded are those who have ongoing menstruation and those who are pregnant or incapable of understanding the numeric pain scales. Women who have any active cancer at study entry (defined as cancer diagnosed or treated within the previous 6 months, recurrent, regionally advanced or metastatic cancer), previous hysterectomy, previous pelvic surgery or radiotherapy, active vaginal or uterus infection, and analgesic use within 24 hours are excluded due to potential interference with pain intensity. The study protocol was approved by the NTUH Research Ethics Committee. During the recruitment process, every eligible participant is fully informed of this trial's aim, design, and content, except for the intervention details. All participants should provide written informed consent. This study is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Sample size estimation: The investigators estimate to recruit at least 248 participants (180 at the NTUH, 68 at the NTUH Hsin-Chu, Bei-Hu, Yunlin, and Cancer Center branches), 50% (124) of whom are randomized to the intervention group, to reach 90% power for the detection of an increase in 3-year cervical cancer screening participation from 30% to 50% at the 5% level of significance. Randomization and blinding: Eligible participants are randomly assigned to either the group receiving the traditional Pap test or the modified Pap test. Computer-generated random numbers are employed for simple randomization with a 1:1 allocation ratio. All participants are kept unaware of any information about group allocation throughout the study period. The operators performing the procedure are not informed by the assistants whether to intervene until a specimen is prepared for cervical cytology. The delayed disclosure of the group allocation until this step ensures that the operators standardize the insertion and opening phases of the Pap test. Cytopathologists who analyze the specimens are blinded to the study. The modified and traditional Pap tests: All operators experienced in techniques for performing a Pap test should attend workshops for a standard operating procedure. The operators include family physicians and gynecologists. A well-trained research assistant is also responsible for ensuring standardization of procedures to eliminate interoperator variability. During the Pap test, there is a privacy curtain separating participants from the operators. An operator separates the labia with hand and then gently inserts the saline-lubricated speculum sideways. The speculum is rotated 90 degrees and opened to achieve an optimal view of the cervix. Then an operator fixes the speculum to obtain the cell samples by brushes. The above-standardized procedures are the same between the two groups. After preparing a specimen for conventional cytology, an operator loosens the locking nut of the speculum, partially closes the blade, rotates the speculum 90 degrees back to its original insertion orientation, and then removes the speculum in the control group receiving the traditional Pap test. For the intervention group receiving the modified Pap test, instead of immediately removing the speculum just after rotating back the speculum, an operator still fixes the speculum in the vagina for 15 seconds. Participants receiving the modified Pap test do not realize what is going on during the 15-second step because they are behind the privacy curtain. Procedurally, the subsequent addition of a non-painful step after specimen collection does not affect specimen quality. Interview, Anthropometric Indices, and Anxiety scores: The investigators review the medical records after getting informed consent. In addition to pain evaluations, this project collects information about tobacco use, alcohol consumption, socioeconomic status, marital status, parity, sexually active status, menopause, predicted pain of Pap smears, psychological stress, anxiety score, analgesic use, current medications, and medical history through standardized personal interviews. Body height and weight are measured using a standard stadiometer, and body mass index is calculated. Blood pressure is measured with an electronic sphygmomanometer while the patient is seated after resting for at least five minutes. Psychological stress is assessed using the Brief Symptom Rating Scale -5 (BSRS-5). The BSRS-5 includes items of anxiety, depression, hostility, interpersonal sensitivity, and insomnia measured by a 5-point Likert-type scale of 0-4. Normal, slight, and great mental stress is defined by the sum of BSRS-5 scores ≤ 5, 6-9, and ≥10, respectively. The anxiety score is obtained using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7). GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21 (0-4: minimal anxiety. 5-9: mild anxiety. 10-14: moderate anxiety. 15-21: severe anxiety). Based on a meta-analysis, some experts have recommended considering using a cut-off of 8 to optimize sensitivity without compromising specificity. Statistical analyses: For the descriptive analyses, values are presented as either numbers (percentages) or mean ± standard deviations. For the univariate analyses, categorical data are compared by the χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Continuous data are compared using the independent T test. To compare screening uptake between trial groups, the investigators apply an ITT principle, such that outcomes are analyzed according to the trial groups assigned, regardless of whether the participants comply with the intervention components of each trial group. Logistic regression analyses are utilized to estimate the association of the intervention with the probability of 3-year and 1-year uptake of cervical cancer screening. The investigators use the five-region hypothesis test based on odds ratios to test the significant indistinguishability of real-time pain between the two groups for confirming the success of randomization and blinding. The effect sizes of five-minute recalled pain on a 1-5 numeric scale and a 0-10 VAS between the two groups are calculated using Glass's delta. Linear regression analyses are used to estimate the effect of the intervention on scores of 5-minute and 3-month recalled pains. Prespecified subgroup analyses using both linear and logistic regression analyses will be performed and summarized visually using forest plots. Major subgroups of interest include women who are never screened (never underwent Pap tests) and women who are under-screened (have not undergone Pap tests in the past 3 years). Statistical significance levels are determined by two-tailed tests (P \< 0.05). The statistical analyses are performed with SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Interventions

For the intervention group receiving the modified Pap test, instead of immediately removing the speculum just after rotating back the speculum, an operator still fixes the speculum in the vagina for 15 seconds.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
CollaboratorOTHER
National Taiwan University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Taiwan University Hospital Beihu Branch
CollaboratorOTHER
National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch
CollaboratorOTHER
National Science and Technology Council
CollaboratorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Cytopathologists who analyze the specimens are blinded to the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 25 or above

Exclusion criteria

* Ongoing menstruation * Pregnancy * Incapability of understanding the numeric pain scales * Any active cancer at study entry (defined as cancer diagnosed or treated within the previous 6 months, recurrent, regionally advanced or metastatic cancer) * Previous hysterectomy, pelvic surgery, or radiotherapy * Active vaginal or uterus infection * Analgesic use within 24 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3-year cervical cancer screening participation3 yearsDefined as attending a Pap test at any clinic before the end of the 3rd subsequent year following study entry

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1-year cervical cancer screening participation1 yearDefined as attending a Pap test at any clinic before the end of the next year following study entry
5-minute recalled pain intensity on a 1-5 numeric scale and a 0-10 visual analog scale5 minutes after receiving the Pap smear testRecalled pain intensity at 5 minutes after the Pap smear test with evaluation by a 1-5 numeric scale and a 0-10 visual analog scale.
3-month recalled pain intensity on a 1-5 numeric scale and a 0-10 visual analog scale3 months after receiving the Pap smear testRecalled pain intensity at 3 months after the Pap smear test with evaluation by a 1-5 numeric scale and a 0-10 visual analog scale. To minimize potential propaganda for cervical cancer screening participation, the investigators choose the 3-month interval rather than 6-month or 1-year intervals for long-term pain recollection after Pap tests.
Real time pain during the Pap test using a 1-5 numeric scaleEvery five seconds throughout the Pap test, up to completion of Pap testThe participants will evaluate and record their pain every five seconds throughout the test with an application on a 1 to 5 numeric scale. The average pain, the maximal pain, and real-time pain at the beginning, first quarter, second quarter, third quarter, and the end of the regular course are compared between the two groups. The investigators will compare the average pain of each group's first and second half of the course's course. For participants receiving the modified Pap test, the investigators further compare the average pain, the maximal pain, and the last recorded real-time pain of the 15-second step with that of the regular course.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

CONTACTChien-Hsieh Chiang, MD, MPH, PhD
jiansie@gmail.com886 + 972651864
CONTACTYu-Chung Wu, MD
jiansie@gmail.com
STUDY_CHAIRChien-Hsieh Chiang, MD, MPH, PhD

National Taiwan University Hospital & College of Medicine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026