Skip to content

Allergy Delabeling in Antibiotic Stewardship - Evaluations

Optimizing Antibiotic Selection in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Reported Beta-lactam Allergy

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06967467
Acronym
RENEW-EVAL
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-05-13
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2029-10-01
Last updated
2026-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Beta Lactam Allergy in Patients With a Hematologic Malignancy

Keywords

penicillin allergy, hematologic cancer, allergy delabeling

Brief summary

The goal of this RENEW-EVAL project is to understand the potential barriers to implementation of the RENEW intervention into the routine clinical care of patients with a hematological malignancy.

Detailed description

The RENEW clinical intervention is designed to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive beta lactam (BL) allergy delabeling intervention on clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with a hematologic malignancy (HM). HM patients are at a high risk of infection-related complications but are limited to antibiotic therapy based on self-reported allergies. The RENEW intervention will test the impact of a pharmacist-led BL allergy delabeling intervention on clinical outcomes and antibiotic use in hospitalized patients with HM. The implementation of clinical interventions are often affected by non-clinical factors including workflow challenges and the beliefs of patients, their families, and clinical staff. The RENEW-EVAL study is a concurrent mixed methods process evaluation of the RENEW intervention that aims to identify the social and behavioral factors that shape implementation of the intervention and to measure implementation outcomes including feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity. Three types of data will be gathered by the research team as part of the RENEW-EVAL project: 1) semistructured interviews with patients and clinicians, (2) ethnographic observations of the delivery of the RENEW intervention, and 3) surveys assessing patient and clinician attitudes towards BL allergy delabeling, and implementation outcomes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSemi-structured interview

Interviews designed to obtain information about patient reasons for enrolling or declining participation in the RENEW Intervention

BEHAVIORALSurvey

Survey which will incorporate a series of closed-ended questions eliciting attitudes about the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, allergy delabeling and future BL antibiotic use

BEHAVIORALEthnographic observation

Observations designed to identify communication and contextual barriers to the implementation of RENEW

Sponsors

Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Utah
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient participants: * a diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy (lymphoma, leukemia, myeloma) * a prior label applied to their medical record to indicate a beta lactam allergy * hospitalized as an inpatient to an oncology service at the time the study is conducted Clinician participants: * member of the primary inpatient care team

Exclusion criteria

Patient participants: * meet one of the exclusionary criteria for the RENEW clinical intervention Clinician participants: * no exclusions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of ImplementationFrom baseline Month 1 to Month 36Feasibility of implementation among clinicians and patients measured by questionnaire. Items are adapted from the validated Feasibility of Implementation Measure (FIM) and are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating "Completely disagree" and 5 indicating "Completely agree." Higher scores indicate better feasibility. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.
Acceptability of ImplementationFrom baseline Month 1 to Month 36Acceptability of implementation among clinicians and patients measured by questionnaire. Items are adapted from the validated Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM) and are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating "Completely disagree" and 5 indicating "Completely agree." Higher scores indicate better acceptability. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 6, 2026