Skip to content

Auricular Acupressure for Sleep Disorder Prevention in Breast Cancer

Auricular Acupressure for the Prevention of Sleep Disorder in Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06964945
Acronym
AA
Enrollment
128
Registered
2025-05-11
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Sleep Disorders Sleep Disturbance Insomnia

Keywords

Auricular acupressure, Breast cancer, Sleep disturbance

Brief summary

Abstract Background: Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent among breast cancer (BC) patients, especially during chemotherapy, significantly affecting quality of life and treatment adherence. Conventional pharmacologic treatments for sleep disorders may cause side effects and are not always effective. Auricular acupressure (AA), a non-invasive alternative therapy, has demonstrated promising effects on sleep improvement. However, high-quality evidence for its use in BC patients remains limited. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of auricular acupressure in preventing sleep disturbances in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: This double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial will recruit 128 participants diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy or hormone therapy. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either auricular acupressure (AA) or sham AA, in addition to usual care. The intervention will be administered over a 12-week period, followed by a 4-week follow-up. In the AA group, Vaccaria seeds will be applied to five specific auricular acupoints. In the sham AA group, identical adhesive patches without seeds will be applied to the same acupoints. Both groups will receive the same treatment schedule and standardized care instructions to ensure blinding. The primary outcome is sleep quality, assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline, and at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Secondary outcomes include fatigue (measured by the BFI-T), anxiety and depression (measured by the HADS), and hypnotic medication use, assessed at baseline, and at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Statistical analysis will be performed using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to examine changes over time and between groups. Expected Results: We hypothesize that AA will significantly improve sleep quality and reduce symptom burden compared to sham AA in BC patients. Conclusion: This study will provide rigorous evidence on the efficacy and safety of auricular acupressure as a complementary intervention for sleep disturbance prevention in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Detailed description

Breast cancer (BC) patients frequently experience sleep disturbances throughout the treatment continuum, with prevalence rates as high as 60-87%. These disturbances are associated with increased physical and psychological burden, impaired treatment adherence, and reduced quality of life. Chemotherapy and hormone therapy, particularly those involving corticosteroids such as dexamethasone, have been identified as major contributors to sleep disruption. Although pharmacological approaches are commonly used to manage sleep issues, they are often accompanied by side effects and limited long-term efficacy. Auricular acupressure (AA), a non-invasive technique derived from Traditional Chinese Medicine, involves stimulating specific ear points using Vaccaria seeds to regulate neurohumoral function. Previous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in general populations with insomnia, but rigorous evidence supporting its role in cancer-related sleep disturbance-especially among BC patients-remains limited. This double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AA in preventing sleep disturbances in BC patients undergoing chemotherapy or hormone therapy. A total of 128 participants with stage I-III BC and no pre-existing sleep disorders will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either AA or sham AA over a 12-week period. Vaccaria seeds will be applied to five auricular points in the intervention group, while identical patches without seeds will be used in the sham group. Both groups will receive standardized sleep hygiene education. The primary outcome is sleep quality, assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Secondary outcomes include fatigue (BFI-T), anxiety and depression (HADS), and hypnotic medication use. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and during follow-up at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Statistical analysis will use Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to compare changes over time between groups. This study is expected to provide high-quality evidence on the use of AA as a complementary strategy for sleep disturbance prevention in BC patients, addressing a critical yet under-recognized aspect of supportive cancer care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAuricular Acupressure with Vaccaria Seeds

Auricular Acupressure with Vaccaria Seeds Participants in this group receive auricular acupressure using 2 mm Vaccaria seeds adhered to five specific auricular acupoints (TF4, CO15, Extra5, LO4, LO4) with 7 mm × 7 mm adhesive patches. Each session lasts 10-20 minutes, with seeds left in place for 5-7 days. A total of 12 weeks, along with standardized sleep hygiene education.

BEHAVIORALSham Auricular Acupressure (No Seeds)

Participants in this group receive sham auricular acupressure using identical adhesive patches without Vaccaria seeds, applied to the same five auricular points. Procedures, duration, frequency, and sleep hygiene education are identical to those in the experimental group to maintain blinding.

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants and outcome assessors are blinded to group allocation. Randomization was performed using stratified block randomization by an independent statistician. Identical adhesive patches were used in both groups to maintain participant blinding. Outcome assessors were not involved in the intervention procedures and were unaware of participant group assignments.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the auricular acupressure group or the sham control group using stratified block randomization based on hormone receptor status and menopausal status. Each participant receives only one type of intervention throughout the 12-week period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female, aged 18 years or older Histologically confirmed stage I-III breast cancer Scheduled to undergo at least four cycles of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy or currently receiving hormone therapy Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score \< 5 at baseline (indicating no pre-existing sleep disorder) Able to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breastfeeding Diagnosed with stage IIIB, inflammatory, or metastatic breast cancer Pre-existing anemia or hematologic disorders History of alcohol or substance abuse Diagnosed endocrine disorders or other medical conditions affecting sleep Active psychiatric disorders interfering with participation Skin lesions, infections, or allergy to adhesive patches on both ears Currently undergoing other complementary sleep-related therapies (e.g., aromatherapy, massage, herbal medicine, health supplements)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep disturbance assessed by PSQIBaseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and follow-up at Week 16Sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a validated 19-item self-report questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fatigue Severity Assessed by BFI-TBaseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Fatigue will be assessed using the Brief Fatigue Inventory - Traditional Chinese version (BFI-T), a 9-item self-report scale measuring fatigue severity and interference. Scores range from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (severe fatigue).
Anxiety and Depression (assessed by HADS)Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Emotional distress will be measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), consisting of two subscales: HADS-A for anxiety and HADS-D for depression. Each subscale includes 7 items scored from 0 to 21.
Hypnotic Medication UseWeek 4, Week 8, Week 12Participants will record daily use of hypnotic medications, including benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepines, antidepressants, melatonin receptor agonists, and other sleep aids. Data will be summarized as weekly usage scores.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactChia-Wen Chuang, PhD Candidate
mavis20023@hotmail.com+88677317123

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026