Skip to content

Validation of the Sentinel Lymph Node Technique in Early-stage Ovarian Cancer (SENTOV II)

Validation of the Sentinel Lymph Node Technique in Early-stage Ovarian Cancer (SENTOV II)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06963268
Acronym
SENTOV II
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-05-08
Start date
2025-11-10
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2025-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Neoplasms

Keywords

Sentinel Node Technique

Brief summary

This clinical trial investigates the sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique as a less invasive alternative to conventional lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer. The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and diagnostic accuracy of the SLN approach in detecting lymphatic metastases. By assessing its negative predictive value, the study aims to determine whether the SLN technique can reliably replace systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. If successful, this technique could minimize surgical morbidity, shorten hospitalization stays, and lower complication rates, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Interventions

A 0.2 ml (27 mBq) dose of 99mTc and 0.5 ml (1.25 mg/ml) of ICG is injected subperitoneally in the dorsal or ventral side of the pelvic infundibulum stump, and 0.2 ml (27 mBq) of 99mTc and 1 ml (1.25 mg/ml) of ICG intracervically. Sentinel nodes are located using the auditory signal from the gamma probe and visually via ICG staining with an infrared light system. After 30 minutes, all identified nodes are removed. Deferred histology applies ultra-staging for negative or micrometastatic nodes.

Sponsors

Hospital Universitario La Fe
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario La Paz
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
CollaboratorOTHER
Quirón Madrid University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital of Navarra
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Son Espases
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitari de la Vall de Hebron
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz
CollaboratorOTHER
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Controlled, prospective, descriptive and not randomized

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent prior to the performance of any procedure related to the clinical trial. * Female, 18 years of age or older at the time of inclusion. * Patients with a histopathological diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumor in a deferred study (any epithelial histology), in apparent early stage FIGO I-II, proposed for staging surgery, or patients with suspected malignant ovarian tumor in apparent early stage FIGO I-II, who will undergo exploratory laparotomy and operative biopsy, and if positive, will undergo staging surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Failure to obtain informed consent or revocation of informed consent. * Under 18 years of age at the time of inclusion. * Previous history of vascular surgery on the aorta, vena cava, or pelvic vessels. * Previous pelvic or paraaortic lymphatic surgery. * Previous lymphoma. * Previous abdomino-pelvic tumor. * Previous allergy to Tc99 or ICG. * Pregnancy/Breastfeeding. Patients who have signed informed consent but do not meet all inclusion criteria and none of the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Negative predictive value of the sentinel lymph node technique.Postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days)To determine the negative predictive value of the sentinel lymph node technique for detecting lymph node metastases, using pelvic/aortic lymphadenectomy as the Gold Standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance of Sentinel Lymph Node Technique vs. LymphadenectomyPostoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Evaluate the degree of concordance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy) between the sentinel lymph node technique and pelvic/aortic lymphadenectomy (Gold Standard) for detecting lymph node metastasis.
Characterize Sentinel Lymph Node Technique vs. Lymphadenectomy for Metastasis DetectionIntraoperative and postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Characterize the sentinel lymph node technique for detecting lymph node metastasis using pelvic/aortic lymphadenectomy as the Gold Standard in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and effectiveness.
Sample CharacterizationBaseline visit and IntraoperativeCharacterize the sample (through collection of baseline characteristics, medical history, tumor markers, intraoperative findings, surgical procedures, and immediate admission data).
Characterize Sentinel Lymph Node Technique Based On Site of Drug InjectionIntraoperative and postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Characterize the sentinel lymph node technique for detecting lymph node metastasis based on the site of drug injection, using lymphadenectomy as the Gold Standard, in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and effectiveness.
Determine the rate of empty sentinel lymph node detection.Postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Determine the rate of empty sentinel lymph node detection.
Determine Sentinel Lymph Node Procedure RateIntraoperative and postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Determine the sentinel lymph node procedure rate.
Identify the anatomical location of the sentinel lymph nodes.Intraoperative and postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Identify the anatomical location of the sentinel lymph nodes.
Determine the number of detected lymph nodes.Intraoperative and postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Determine the number of detected lymph nodes.
Rate of overstaging with ultrastaging.Postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Rate of overstaging with ultrastaging.
Complications related to the sentinel lymph node techniqueIntraoperative and postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Complications related to the sentinel lymph node technique.
Complications related to lymphadenectomy.Intraoperative and postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Complications related to lymphadenectomy.
Determine Pelvic and/or Paraaortic Sentinel Lymph Node Detection RateIntraoperative and postoperative (30 days +/- 10 days).Determine the detection rate of pelvic and/or paraaortic sentinel lymph nodes.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactMónica Cebrián Coordinator Clinical Research Area
investigacion_clinica@iislafe.es+34961246731

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026