Skip to content

Testing of a New Joint Protection Program

Feasibility of a Remotely-Delivered, Technology-Enabled, Joint Protection Program

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06963164
Acronym
Helping Hand
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-05-08
Start date
2025-09-30
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hand Osteoarthritis

Keywords

hand osteoarthritis, randomize controlled trial, feasibility, pilot

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to to examine the feasibility of a full-scale trial on Helping Hand, a new Joint Protection Program for Hand Osteoarthritis and to examine the acceptability of the new Joint Protection Program. This study will not assess the effectiveness of the program, as it is not designed or powered to do so. Instead, the information gathered will be used to refine the trial design and ensure the future full-scale trial that will assess the effectiveness of the program is robust and successful. The acceptability of the new Joint Protection Program will be assessed through a survey that will be administered to the intervention group at the end of the trial, which will be based on a standardized acceptability framework Participants will: Gain access to an online Joint Protection Program or continue to receive usual care for 12 weeks Visit the clinic or complete online assessments once every 4 weeks Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they used other interventions to manage their symptoms (i.e. painkillers)

Detailed description

The goal of this study is to to examine the feasibility of a definite trial on Helping Hand, a new Joint Protection Program for Hand Osteoarthritis and to examine the acceptability of the new Joint Protection Program. Joint protection refers to a set of techniques and strategies that help reduce stress on the joints, manage pain, and prevent further joint damage. These techniques are particularly important for people with hand arthritis, as the small joints in the hands are often affected, leading to pain, stiffness, and difficulty performing daily tasks. Key principles of joint protection include: 1. Using larger, stronger joints whenever possible (e.g., using the forearm instead of the fingers to push open a door). 2. Reducing strain by spreading the load across multiple joints (e.g., carrying items with two hands instead of one). 3. Avoid tight gripping or pinching motions that can overstrain the joints. 4. Incorporating assistive devices to reduce effort during tasks (e.g., jar openers or ergonomic tools). 5. Pacing and prioritizing activities to avoid overuse of the joints and allow for adequate rest. By adopting these strategies, people with hand arthritis can minimize discomfort and preserve their ability to perform daily activities. This research is important because hand arthritis can make everyday tasks-like opening jars, getting dressed, or gardening-painful and difficult. Current resources for managing arthritis often lack a focus on practical, evidence-based strategies tailored to the needs of people with hand arthritis. This feasibility study will test the practicality of running a future full-scale randomized controlled trial and the acceptability of the intervention. The feasibility testing includes evaluating key trial processes such as recruitment rates (how many people agree to participate), randomization (how well participants are assigned to groups), attrition rates (how many people stay in the study until the end), adherence (whether participants follow the program as intended), and clinical outcome completion rates (how many participants complete the required assessments). The acceptability of the intervention will be assessed through a survey that will be administered to the intervention group at the end of the trial, which will be based on a standardized acceptability framework. Importantly, this study will not assess the effectiveness of the program, as it is not designed or powered to do so. Instead, the information gathered will be used to refine the trial design and ensure the future full-scale trial is robust and successful.

Interventions

OTHERHelping Hand - Joint Protection Program

Joint protection refers to a set of techniques and strategies that help reduce stress on the joints, manage pain, and prevent further joint damage. These techniques are particularly important for people with hand arthritis, as the small joints in the hands are often affected, leading to pain, stiffness, and difficulty performing daily tasks. Key principles of joint protection include: 1. Using larger, stronger joints whenever possible (e.g., using the forearm instead of the fingers to push open a door). 2. Reducing strain by spreading the load across multiple joints (e.g., carrying items with two hands instead of one). 3. Avoid tight gripping or pinching motions that can overstrain the joints. 4. Incorporating assistive devices to reduce effort during tasks (e.g., jar openers or ergonomic tools). 5. Pacing and prioritizing activities to avoid overuse of the joints and allow for adequate rest

Sponsors

The Arthritis Society, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis Pain symptoms for at least 3 months Ability to use a smartphone, tablet, or computer Ability to communicate in English

Exclusion criteria

Presence of neurological disorders, dementia, or other cognitive conditions that could interfere with trial procedures Scheduled hand surgery within the next 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recruitment Rates4, 8, and 12-weeks after randomizationPre-defined cut-off scores will be used. Based on the cut-off scores each outcome will be categorised in one of three categories: proceed; proceed with modifications; and do not proceed. Recruitment rates will be classified as proceed if they achieve or surpass the predefined threshold set at 8-10 participants on average per month.
Adherence4, 8, and 12-weeks after randomizationUptake/participation will be tracked electronically by recording when participants log onto the website and monitoring whether participants show up in the live sessions. Adherence will also be measured by having the participants track the weekly modifications they performed through a self-reported diary. Pre-defined cut-off scores will be used. Based on the cut-off scores each outcome will be categorised in one of three categories: proceed; proceed with modifications; and do not proceed. Adherence to the intervention protocol will be categorized as proceed if it achieves a minimum adherence rate of 85%.
Clinical outcome measure completionbaseline, 4, 8, and 12-weeks after randomizationPre-defined cut-off scores will be used. Based on the cut-off scores each outcome will be categorised in one of three categories: proceed; proceed with modifications; and do not proceed. Outcome completeness will be considered proceed when data collection for at least 90% of the intended outcomes is achieved.
Attrition Rates4, 8, and 12-weeks after randomizationPre-defined cut-off scores will be used. Based on the cut-off scores each outcome will be categorised in one of three categories: proceed; proceed with modifications; and do not proceed. Attrition rates will be classified as proceed if they remain below the predefined threshold, typically set at 20% or lower

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactJoy MacDermid, PT, PHD
jmacderm@uwo.ca519-646-6000
Backup ContactDimitra Pouliopoulou, PT, MSc
dpouliop@uwo.ca519-646-6100

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026