Skip to content

Real-world Effect of Switching From Intermittently-scanned to Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (Switch CGM Retro)

Effect of Switching From Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With Diabetes: A Real-world, Canadian Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06962735
Enrollment
220
Registered
2025-05-08
Start date
2024-01-25
Completion date
2024-08-29
Last updated
2025-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

The objective of this retrospective, observational study, is to better understand the real-world glycemic effectiveness of switching to real time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) from intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) among adults with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes in Canada.

Interventions

Individuals who switched from using isCGM to rtCGM

Sponsors

DexCom, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older as of the index date * Clinical diagnosis of T1D or T2D ≥ one year * Using either MDI or CSII therapy * Initiated a FreeStyle Libre® isCGM device between January 1, 2018 and July 31, 2023 (isCGM cohort) * Switched from a FreeStyle Libre® 1 or Libre 2® isCGM device to a Dexcom® G5 or G6 CGM device between April 1, 2018 and July 31, 2023 (rtCGM cohort) * Baseline HbA1c ≥7.0% for primary objective with rtCGM cohort * Baseline HbA1c ≥8.0% for key secondary objective comparing rtCGM cohort to isCGM cohort * Known rtCGM/isCGM start date (month and year) * Exclusive use of isCGM for ≥ 3 months * ≥ one HbA1c value up to 6 months (± 6 weeks) prior to index date (HbA1c value must be after isCGM initiation and no more than 6 weeks after the index date) * ≥ one HbA1c value 6-12 months (± 6 weeks) following the index date * Informed consent for their medical record data to be used for research purposes

Exclusion criteria

* Have a prior history of rtCGM within 12 months of the index date * Are pregnant at the time of isCGM initiation or time of switch to rtCGM * Used the isCGM or rtCGM for \< 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1c at 6-12-month follow-up compared to baselinefrom index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate change in HbA1c at 6-12-month follow-up compared to baseline after switching from an isCGM system to a rtCGM system in adults with type 1 diabetes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in percent time in target glucose range (TIR) at 6-12 months follow-upfrom index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate change in percent TIR at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Change in percent time below target glucose range (TBR)from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate change in percent TBR at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Change in percent time above target glucose range (TAR)from index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate change in percent TAR at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Change in mean glucosefrom index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate change in mean glucose at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Change in standard deviation (SD) of mean glucosefrom index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate change in SD of mean glucose at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Change in coefficient of variation (CV) of mean glucosefrom index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate change in CV of mean glucose at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Change in HbA1c in the rtCGM switch cohort compared to a matched isCGM cohortfrom index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo compare 6-12 month change in HbA1c in the rtCGM switch cohort, who switched from isCGM to rtCGM, compared to a propensity score matched isCGM cohort, who maintained isCGM use, among a subgroup of patients with T1D and HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Proportion of patients who achieve HbA1c ≤7.0%evaluated at 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate the proportion of patients who achieve HbA1c ≤7.0% at 6-12 months follow-up in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% at baseline and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% at baseline.
Weekly incidence of self-reported hypoglycemiaevaluated at 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate weekly incidence of self-reported hypoglycemia at 6-12 months in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Proportion of patients with ≥ 1 self-reported hypoglycemic eventevaluated at 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate proportion of patients with ≥ 1 self-reported hypoglycemic event at 6-12 months in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Change in total daily dose (TDD) of insulinfrom index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate change in TDD of insulin at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.
Proportion of patients using a Tandem® insulin pump in the rtCGM switch cohortfrom index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate proportion of patients using a Tandem® insulin pump in the rtCGM switch cohort during the study period from baseline to 6-12 months follow-up.
Change in weightfrom index date to 6- to-12-month follow-upTo evaluate change in weight at 6-12 months follow-up compared to baseline in the rtCGM switch cohort, and between the rtCGM switch cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and propensity score matched isCGM cohort with HbA1c ≥ 7.5%.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026