Skip to content

Posterior Mitral Isthmus Line With Vein of Marshall Ethanolisation Compared With Anterior Mitral Lines in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Posterior Mitral Isthmus Line With Vein of Marshall Ethanolisation Compared With Anterior Mitral Lines in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06962176
Acronym
MIVANT
Enrollment
146
Registered
2025-05-08
Start date
2025-07-31
Completion date
2027-07-31
Last updated
2025-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Vein of Marshall ethanolization, Mitral line ablation

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical study is to find out which treatment works best for people with persistent atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat). Researchers are comparing two types of heart ablation procedures: * An anterior mitral line ablation (a treatment at the front part of the heart) * A posterior mitral line ablation (at the back of the heart), sometimes with an extra step using a small vein called the Vein of Marshall The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Which approach works better at fixing the heart rhythm? * Which approach is safer (less complications)? People who take part in this study will: * Undergo an ablation procedure as part of their standard care * Attend follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months * Have tests like ECGs, heart ultrasound (echocardiogram), blood tests, heart rhythm monitors (Holter), and a heart CT scan

Detailed description

The MIVANT trial aims to compare two different strategies for treating patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) using catheter ablation techniques. AF is a common heart rhythm disorder, and in persistent forms, it often does not respond adequately to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. For this reason, many patients require additional ablation lines in the left atrium to reduce arrhythmia recurrence and improve long-term rhythm control. One such ablation strategy involves creating a linear lesion across the mitral isthmus-a region between the mitral valve and the pulmonary veins. There are two main anatomical approaches to target this area: * The anterior mitral line, which connects the right superior pulmonary vein to the mitral annulus * The posterior mitral line, which connects the left inferior pulmonary vein to the mitral annulus The posterior line is technically more challenging because of the complex anatomy, proximity to blood vessels, and epicardial electrical pathways that can bypass endocardial lesions. However, this difficulty can be addressed by a technique known as Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion. The VOM is a small vein near the mitral isthmus that contains nerve fibers and muscle bundles involved in atrial arrhythmias. Infusing ethanol into this vein can help create more effective and lasting ablation lines by reaching areas that standard catheter ablation cannot. The MIVANT study will enroll 146 adult patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who are already scheduled to receive additional ablation beyond PVI. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either: * A posterior mitral line ablation, with or without ethanol infusion into the Vein of Marshall, depending on anatomical feasibility * An anterior mitral line ablation without ethanol infusion All procedures will be performed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation, using state-of-the-art mapping and ablation tools. Standardized ablation parameters will be followed to ensure consistency and quality across sites. The main objective of this study is to determine whether the posterior approach-with possible VOM infusion-leads to a higher success rate of procedural bidirectional block across the mitral line, compared to the anterior approach. Secondary objectives include assessing: * Safety outcomes such as bleeding, stroke, or coronary artery injury * Efficiency of the procedure, including total time, fluoroscopy exposure, and number of lesions needed * Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 6 months * Patient quality of life * Hospitalizations related to cardiovascular events Participants will attend follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months, during which they will undergo tests such as ECGs, echocardiography, Holter monitoring, CT coronary angiography, and blood tests. This study is expected to last a total of 24 months, with 18 months allocated for patient recruitment and a minimum of 6 months follow-up per participant. The study is coordinated by AZ Sint-Jan Brugge AV in Belgium, with possible collaboration from other high-volume centers in France and Switzerland. The findings of the MIVANT study will help clarify whether posterior mitral isthmus ablation-with the aid of Vein of Marshall ethanolisation-is a more effective and equally safe alternative to the anterior approach in the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAnterior Mitral Line Ablation

First pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is performed - either as a first-time isolation (index procedure) or a re-isolation (in repeat procedures). Then a linear lesion is created on the anterior wall of the left atrium, from the roof line to the mitral annulus.

PROCEDUREPosterior Mitral Isthmus Ablation with Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is systematically carried out before any additional ablation lines are created - either as initial isolation or re-isolation. In this group the posterior mitral isthmus, a region between the left inferior pulmonary vein and the mitral annulus, is targeted. Endocardial ablation using a dual energy catheter (RF and PF) is combined with ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (VOM), which ablates the adjacent epicardial tissue to enhance lesion durability.

Sponsors

AZ Sint-Jan AV
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years, diagnosed with symptomatic persistent AF with clinical indication for left atrial ablation with a mitral isthmus line. Pulmonary vein will be isolated in all patients before starting the mitral isthmus line (during a previous or the same procedure)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous mitral line or any other left atrial ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation * Left atrial (LA) thrombus. LA thrombus can be determined by preprocedural imaging: CT, transesophageal echocardiography or MRI. * LA diameter greater than 60 mm on long axis parasternal view, or left atrial volume more than 250 cc. * Left ventricular ejection fraction \<25%. * Cardiac surgery within the previous 90 days. * Expecting cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery within 180 days. * Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/stenting or myocardial infarction within the previous 30 days. * Documented history of a thromboembolic event within the previous 60 days. * Diagnosed atrial myxoma. * Significant restrictive, constrictive, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with chronic symptoms. * Significant congenital anomaly or medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude enrollment * Women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant during the study. * Acute illness or active infection at time of index procedure * Renal insufficiency * Unstable angina. * History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities. * Contraindication to anticoagulation. * Life expectancy less than 1 year. * Uncontrolled heart failure. * Presence of a condition that precludes vascular access. * International normalised ratio (INR) greater than 4 within 24 hours of procedure - for patients taking warfarin. * Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients with procedural linear bidirectional blockDuring procedureAfter first-pass ablation, bidirectional block across the mitral isthmus line will be assessed by conventional methods consisting of differential pacing maneuvers and documenting widely separated double potentials across the entire length of the line and high-density activation mapping with the Optrell catheter. In the case of absence of block, PF applications will be carried out on the RF line where the earliest activation will be evidenced, for an target index of \>550. In the case of absence of block after PF ablation, additional RF and PF ablation points will be performed at the earliest activation sites, adjacent to the previous lesions. A maximum total duration of RF and PF application of 20 min will be allowed for both lines, after which the failure of block will be accepted. Bidirectional conduction block will be reassessed ≥10min after the last ablation lesion along the lines.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural parameters: total procedure time (min)During procedureComparison of procedural parameters between groups: total procedure time (min)
Procedural parameters: fluoroscopy time (min)During procedureComparison of procedural parameters between groups: fluoroscopy time (min)
Procedural parameters: total RF ablation time (min)During procedureComparison of procedural parameters between groups: total RF ablation time
Procedural parameters: total ablation time (min)During procedureComparison of procedural parameters between groups: total ablation time
Procedural safety6 monthsCharacterization of complications, including pericardial effusion, stroke and coronary stenosis
Cardiovascular-related hospitalizations6 monthsCharacterization of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations in both groups
Recurrence of arrhythmia6 monthsRecurrence of arrhythmia, assessed 24 hour Holter monitoring 3 months post procedure and 7-day Holter monitoring 6 months post procedure
Quality of life (SF-36 and AF Symtoms Checklist)6 monthsCharacterization of quality of life, assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) and the AF Symptom Checklist
Left atrial function at 6 months follow-up6 monthsLeft atrial function at 6 months follow-up, assessed using transthoracic echocardiography
Procedural parameters: number of ablation lesions requiredDuring procedureComparison of procedural parameters between groups: number of ablation lesions required

Contacts

Primary ContactEmma Christiaen, PhD
emma.christiaen@azsintjan.be003250453293

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026