Skip to content

Clinical Study on the Safety and Efficacy of the Minimally Invasive Ennovate® Method for Pedicle Screw Placement

Controlled, Randomized Clinical Study to Demonstrate the Patient Benefit and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement Through an Innovative Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach Using the Ennovate® Cervical Spinal System

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06960018
Acronym
MISPEC
Enrollment
76
Registered
2025-05-07
Start date
2025-06-20
Completion date
2028-11-01
Last updated
2026-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Spine Disease, Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

posterior cervical fusion, pedicle screw

Brief summary

The study's main purpose is the collection of clinical data on the patients benefit and safety of pedicle screw placement through an innovative minimally invasive surgical approach compared to the state of the art open surgical approach using the Ennovate® Cervical Spinal System.

Interventions

DEVICEEnnovate® Cervical, open surgical technique

Patients with need of posterior monosegmental and multisegmenta stabilization of the cervical and upper thoracic spine, because of * Fractures * Degenerative instability * Post-trauma instability * Tumors * Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis will be treated with Ennovate® Cervical system using an open surgical technique

DEVICEEnnovate® Cervical, minimal invasive surgical technique

Patients with need of posterior monosegmental and multisegmenta stabilization of the cervical and upper thoracic spine, because of * Fractures * Degenerative instability * Post-trauma instability * Tumors * Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis will be treated with Ennovate® Cervical system using a minimally invasive technique.

Sponsors

Aesculap AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Block randomization with random block length will be used. The electronic data capture system will instruct the clinical investigator to use either the open or the minimally invasive surgical technique.

Intervention model description

Subjects will be randomly allocated to one of the two study groups in a 1:1 ratio. In addition, stratification by clinical investigation sites is applied. Group 1: Patients treated with the Ennovate® Cervical system using an open surgical technique. Group 2: Patients treated with the Ennovate® Cervical system using a minimally invasive technique. Study is designed to provide a comparison of the both groups regarding the short-term pain outcome.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients with minimum 18 years of age receiving Ennovate® Cervical internal fixation device within the vertebral bodies C2-Th3 to ensure the restoration and stabilization of the cervical spine

Exclusion criteria

* All patients not willing to sign the patient consent are excluded. Also, if it is clear from the beginning, that the patient will not be able to come to routine follow-up, the patient will also be excluded. Absolute contraindications according to the IFU: * Severe damage to the bone structures of the spine that could prevent the stable implantation of the implant components; for example, osteopenia, severe osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone tumors etc. * Metabolic or degenerative metabolic bone diseases that could compromise the stable anchoring of the implant system. * Suspected allergy or sensitivity to the implant materials. * Acute or chronic vertebral infections of a local or systemic nature. * Poor patient compliance or limited ability to follow medical instructions, particularly in the postop phase, including with regard to the restrictions on range of movement in terms of physical exercise and occupational activity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)4 (+/- 1 day) postoperativeVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "maximal/worst pain". Pain will be recorded at minimum 12 months postoperatively, if available in the preoperative clinical routine data, it will also be recorded in the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Screw placement accuracyintraoperative or discharge visit (approx. 10 days post op.)Evaluation of the accuracy of screw placement will be performed according to the method described by Bredow using CT/3D-Scans made at intraoperative/discharge visit.
Neck Disability Index (NDI)praeoperative, postoperative (4 days +/- 1day, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years)The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a widely used and validated self-assessment tool for measuring disability due to neck pain. (Measured over the course of the study) * 0-4 (0-8%): No disability * 5-14 (10-28%): Mild disability * 15-24 (30-48%): Moderate disability * 25-34 (50-64%): Severe disability * 35-50 (70-100%): Complete disability
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)praeoperative, postoperative (4 days +/- 1day, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years)EQ-5D is a standardized 5-dimension (5D) 5-level (5L) measure of the health status and is developed by the EuroQol Group in order to have a simple and generic measure for clinical and economic assessment. Instructions for the user are directly included into the questionnaire and it consists of two pages. One cover five different dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and the other one the EQ visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). The VAS scale records the self rated health status of the patient from the level "the worst health you can imagine" to "the best health you can imagine".
Quality of Life (EQ-VAS)praeoperative, postoperative (4 days +/- 1day, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years)EQ-5D is a standardized 5-dimension (5D) 5-level (5L) measure of the health status and is developed by the EuroQol Group in order to have a simple and generic measure for clinical and economic assessment. Instructions for the user are directly included into the questionnaire and it consists of two pages. One cover five different dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and the other one the EQ visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). The VAS scale records the self rated health status of the patient from the level "the worst health you can imagine" to "the best health you can imagine".
Rate of Adverse Events / Serious Adverse EventsDuring the course of the study up to two years postoperatively(Serious) Adverse Events During the course of the study, any upcoming intra- or postoperative (serious) adverse device events or effects ((S)AE) related or not related to the product under investigation, will be documented. The total number of (S)AEs will be summarized and further evaluated by the sponsor and reported according to local legislation and necessity. Recorded complications will be categorized and analyzed in order to assess the safety of the investigational product.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)praeoperative, postoperative (2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years)Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "maximal/worst pain". Pain will be recorded at minimum 12 months postoperatively, if available in the preoperative clinical routine data, it will also be recorded in the study.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTSarah Mattes
studies@aesculap.de+497461
CONTACTStefan Maenz, Dr.
studies@aesculap.de+497461

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 16, 2026