Modification of Inhibitory Control and Craving Through Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) as an Add-On Treatment for Substance Use Disorder

Alcohol Use Disorder, Substance Use Disorders

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS, Inhibition Training, Electroencephalography, EEG, Inhibitory Control, Working Memory, Craving

The aim of this project is to investigate the potential of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to reduce cognitive deficits and substance craving in individuals with substance use disorders (SUD), with a focus on alcohol use disorder (AUD). Patients of any gender between the ages of 18 and 65 are examined who are in our inpatient and day clinic settings for a standard detoxification treatment program. As there are conflicting findings regarding the effective settings for tDCS as an adjunctive treatment in SUD (e.g., effects on inhibitory control seem to be sensitive to current direction), the aim is to examine and compare three different active tDCS conditions, a sham tDCS condition (placebo), inhibition training, and a control group of patients receiving only standard detoxification treatment. The aim is to identify the optimal electrode placement and current direction to positively influence both inhibitory control and craving, leading to improved treatment outcomes such as longer abstinence periods or reduced substance use after relapse.

The aim of this study is to determine the optimal electrode placement and current direction of tDCS as an adjunctive therapy for SUD to improve both inhibitory control and craving, ultimately contributing to better treatment outcomes such as longer abstinence periods and reduced substance use after relapse. To achieve this, the investigators will assess inhibitory control in SUD patients using computerized neuropsychological testing before and after multiple tDCS sessions with different stimulation protocols. In addition, the effects of tDCS on inhibitory control will be investigated by EEG recordings, focusing on the N2 and P3 components. To ensure that tDCS stimulation occurs at exactly the same location for each stimulation session, tDCS electrodes (25 cm2) are placed at defined locations in the EEG cap (10/20 system) using saline-soaked sponges. The current is ramped up from 0.3 mA to 2 mA at a rate of 0.1 mA per second and remains at 2 mA for the duration of the active stimulation (20 min total; 0.08 mA/cm2). The tDCS sessions last 20 minutes on five consecutive days. Four active tDCS stimulations, one sham stimulation, two active control groups and one control group without ad-on treatment are investigated. All groups receive a qualified detoxification treatment in the clinic. First, the investigators want to test whether anodal stimulation is indeed hemispherically sensitive in affecting inhibitory control, while craving reduction is independent of it. Since tDCS (with one anodal and one cathodal electrode) has a poor spatial resolution, the investigators also want to test whether tDCS has a more general effect on brain metabolism and thus on task performance. Therefore, the study includes a control group with anodal stimulation over the occipital cortex at the border with the cerebellum. In addition, computerized inhibition training will be performed to investigate the effects of active, high-frequency contact and behavioral training compared to tDCS. Participants will also receive the same protocol with sham tDCS as well as a no-intervention group to avoid confounding by placebo effects and to control whether participation in the study itself constitutes a treatment. On the first examination day (T1), psychometric measures are collected, neuropsychological testing is conducted, and EEG recordings are performed during a modified Go/No-Go task. Depending on group allocation, participants receive their first tDCS session, inhibition training, sham stimulation, or no intervention. On intervention days 2-4 (T2-T4), participants continue their assigned interventions. On day 5 (T5), they receive the final intervention along with another EEG measurement during the Go/No-Go task. Follow-up assessments take place via telephone at 4 weeks (T6), 8 weeks (T7), and 24 weeks (T9) to record self-reported relapse and substance use. At 12 weeks (T8), participants return for an in-person assessment, including EEG measurement during the modified Go/No-Go task.

Germany