Skip to content

The Impact of Intelligent Patient Management Model on Medication Adherence of Pyrotinib Compared to Traditional Patient Management Model: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

The Impact of Intelligent Patient Management Model on Medication Adherence of Pyrotinib Compared to Traditional Patient Management Model: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06958627
Acronym
any
Enrollment
964
Registered
2025-05-06
Start date
2024-04-30
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2025-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HER2 Positive Breast Cancer, Pyrotinib Treatment

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical study to evaluate the effect of using intelligent patient management system on medication adherence of HER2 positive breast cancer patients receiving pyrotinib treatment. Pyrotinib is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can irreversibly inhibit HER1, HER2, and HER4.

Interventions

DRUGpyrotinib

Intelligent patient management system on medication adherence of HER2 positive breast cancer patients receiving pyrotinib treatment.

Sponsors

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Intervention model description

randomized controlled clinical study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients aged ≥ 18 years. * Histologically confirmed HER2-positive breast cancer (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with ISH+). * Patients expected to receive pyrotinib-containing regimens for neoadjuvant therapy or metastatic/unresectable breast cancer. ·≤1 prior line of anti-HER2 therapy during the recurrent/metastatic stage. * Ability to operate a mobile phone and read independently. * Deemed psychologically and physically suitable for participation by the investigator.

Exclusion criteria

* History of cognitive impairment. * Severe visual or auditory impairments. * Prior use of pyrotinib. * Pregnancy, lactation, or intention to conceive. * Ineffective cognitive-behavioral interventions within the past year. * Participation in other clinical trials within 1 month prior to screening. * Investigator judgment of unsuitability due to psychological or physical conditions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
medication adherence at 1-year1-yearmedication adherence at 1-year is assessed using the tablet counting method and Eight-Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale Evaluation Method 1: Tablet Counting Method 1. Definition/Formula: Adherence percentage = (Actual tablets taken / Total tablets prescribed) \* 100% (Actual tablets taken = Total prescribed tablets - Remaining tablets - Lost tablets) 2. Procedure: At the screening phase and Day 21 of each cycle, calculate the adherence percentage based on APP check-ins, and confirm the actual remaining tablets through follow-up. Evaluation Method 2: MMAS-8 Scale (1)Definition: The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) is a validated 8-item questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating better adherence: 8: Good adherence 6-7: Moderate adherence \<6: Poor adherence (2)Procedure: Administer the MMAS-8 scale at the screening phase and Day 21 of each cycle. The total score is calculated as the sum of scores from the 8 questions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The time to deterioration (TTD)time from the date of randomization to the date of the first clinically significant deterioration through study completion, an average of 2 yearTTD is defined as the time from randomization to confirmation of the first clinically significant deterioration (deterioration ≥ 10 points) in subsequent follow-up or death
Event-free survival (EFS)From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years.EFS (defined as the time from randomization to the first documentation of progressing disease while on study therapy, postoperative disease recurrence, or death from any cause)
Overall survival (OS)From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 4 yearsthe time from randomisation to death from any cause
PROFrom date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 4 yearsEORTC QLQ-C30 and NCC-BC-A1.0 questionnaire: 1. Outcome Measure 1 (1)Description: Scale Full Name: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Score Range:Global Health Status/QoL Scale: 0-100. Functional Scales (e.g., Physical, Role): 0-100. Symptom Scales (e.g., Fatigue): 0-100. (2)Interpretation: Higher scores on Global Health Status/QoL and Functional Scales indicate better outcomes.Higher scores on Symptom Scales indicate worse outcomes. 2. Outcome Measure 2 (1)Description: Scale Full Name: National Cancer Center Breast Cancer-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Scale Version 1.0 (NCC-BC-A1.0). Score Range:Total Score: 38-190 points (each item scored 1-5). (2)Interpretation:Higher total scores indicate poorer quality of life (for symptom-related items).Lower scores on positive function items (e.g., confidence, support) indicate worse outcomes. 3. Time Frame: Baseline, every 2 cycles, and at end of treatment.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJiani Wang, M.D.
ncc_wangjiani@126.com86010877-88120

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026