Skip to content

Septal Bone Expansion Using Osseodensification Versus Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation

Septal Bone Expansion Using Osseodensification Versus Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation for Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molars [Randomized Clinical Trial]

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06957860
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-05-05
Start date
2023-11-23
Completion date
2024-08-24
Last updated
2025-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant, Osseodensification

Brief summary

: Implant placement in the inter radicular septum is usually considered the best option for an immediate molar implant, not only in terms of correct 3D positioning, but also regarding implant survival, Osseodensification was shown to enhance implant primary stability, due to the compaction auto-grafting and the associated spring-back effect. Piezoelectric implant site preparation (PISP) has been proposed as an alternative technique to improve surgical control, safety, and bone healing response Aim of the work: To evaluate and compare stability changes using insertion torque values (ITV) and Implant Stability Quotient values (ISQ) for immediately placed implants in molar septum using Osseodensification technique and Piezoelectric implant site preparation (PISP) technique.

Interventions

Four Intra-lift diamond tips were used for drilling the osteotomy, increasing diameters till a final diameter of 2.8 mm is reached for placement of 3.5 mm diameter and 10-12 mm length implant.

implant drilling procedures will be done using the surgical drills of the supplier kit of densah burs. Surgical drills of increasing diameters will be used till a final drill diameter of 3 mm for placement of a 3.5 mm diameter.

Sponsors

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

the statistician will be blinded to the treatment groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients with hopeless mandibular molar teeth in the posterior region in need of implant placement . * A fully intact facial bone wall at the extraction site. * Systemically healthy, received no head and neck radiation for cancer treatment. * Absence of periapical pathologies or suppuration at the time of installing the implants. * Septal bone after atraumatic extraction not less than 3 mm.

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic conditions that would prevent successful healing or implant osseointegration; examples are uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus, metabolic bone disorders, autoimmune diseases, or Bisphosphonate therapy. * Heavy smoker patients. * Presence of preapical bone loss related to extracted tooth. * Patient is not indicated for immediate implant placement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in implant stabilityBaseline and 3 monthsThe implant stability quotient (ISQ) will be measured using the Osstell device- resonance frequency analysis test at 3 months post-surgery to all the installed fixtures.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in bone densityBaseline and 3 monthsUsing CBCT

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026