Skip to content

Efficacy of Eflornithine Hydrochloride Cream in the Treatment of Melasma: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Split-face Controlled Study

Randomised Double-blinded Split-face Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Eflornithine Hydrochloride Cream Compared to Topical Hydroquinone 2% Cream for the Treatment of Melasma.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06957834
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-05-05
Start date
2023-06-06
Completion date
2024-07-11
Last updated
2025-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melasma

Keywords

Melasma, Dermatology, Eflornithine

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Eflornithine hydrochloride cream works to treat melasma in adults, in comparison to Hydroquinone cream. It will also learn about the safety of Eflornithine hydrochloride cream. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does Eflornithine hydrochloride improve melasma assessment scores over a 3-month duration compared to Hydroquinone cream? * What side effects might patients get while using Eflornithine hydrochloride cream? Participants will: * Apply both Eflornithine hydrochloride and Hydroquinone creams on separate halves of their faces every day for 3 months. * Visit the clinic once at the 2-month mark and once at the 3-month mark for checkups and tests.

Interventions

DRUGEflornithine hydrochloride cream

Eflornithine hydrochloride cream at 11.5% applied twice daily

Hydroquinone 2% cream, applied twice daily

Sponsors

National Skin Centre
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This is a randomized, double-blinded, split-face study. Both treatments (Eflornithine hydrochloride, and Hydroquinone) will be applied simultaneously: one on the left side of the face and the other on the right side. Treatment allocation to facial sides will be randomized, and participants blinded (both treatments with similar packaging, look and consistency). Outcomes will be assessed on each side of the face by a blinded evaluator.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of melasma * Fitzpatrick Type III or IV * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating patients * Patients with difficulty adhering to regular topical treatments * Patients with known contact allergies to any of the ingredients in the topical medications used in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI)At 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Mexameter melanin scoreAt 8 and 12 weeksMexameter device (Courage + Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Germany)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mexameter erythema scoreAt 8 and 12 weeksMexameter device (Courage + Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Germany)
Patient Satisfaction ScoreAt 8 and 12 weeksFor each side of the face, each patient and dermatologist was asked to grade the severity of melasma from a score of 0 (cleared), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) to 3 (severe)
Physician Global AssessmentAt 8 and 12 weeksFor each side of the face, each patient and dermatologist was asked to grade the severity of melasma from a score of 0 (cleared), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) to 3 (severe)

Countries

Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026