Skip to content

Erector Spinae Plane Block as Analgesia in Patients for Colectomy

Erector Spinae Plane Block as Analgesia in Patients for Colectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06957574
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-05-04
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2024-12-15
Last updated
2025-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colo-rectal Cancer

Keywords

erector spinae plane, colectomy

Brief summary

Management of postoperative pain relief is largely inadequate. Despite the recent advances in pain management, postoperative pain incidence has not decreased; most patients still experience severe pain after major surgery. Poorly or inadequately controlled pain was reported to be linked to prolonged hospitalization, decreased patient satisfaction, the risk of readmission, and a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

Detailed description

In major abdominal surgeries, the gold standard for postoperative analgesia is thoracic epidural analgesia. Nevertheless, there are many concerns regarding its side effects, including motor blockade and hypotension. Moreover, many researchers interrogated its role as it may increase the risk of serious problems such as epidural hematoma and abscess. As an alternative, some surgeons proposed the transversus abdominis plane (TAP); however, a recent meta-analysis established that TAP block was of minimal effect. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a fairly original paraspinal plane block that was first designated for thoracic analgesia. Recently, some reports showed that it could offer effective and widespread somatic and visceral abdominal analgesia. Bilateral continuous ESP blockade represents a respected alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia. The local injection under the erector spinae muscle is carried out in this technique, which is estimated to spread a paravertebral of three vertebral levels cranially and four levels caudally. It was designated that the injected local anesthesia passes across the costotransverse foramina and blocks the ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves, causing a sensory blockade over the anterolateral thorax. The dermatomes enclosed by ESPB depend on the site of entry, the volume, and the concentration of the local anesthetic used. This RCT aimed to assess the analgesic effectiveness of US-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing elective colectomy. This randomized controlled trial was designed to assess the analgesic effectiveness of bilateral US-guided erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB) in patients undergoing elective colectomy surgery.

Interventions

DRUGNormal Saline (Placebo)

ESPB using normal saline 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine on each side

ESPB using local anesthetic 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine on each side

Sponsors

Suez Canal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients of colorectal carcinoma scheduled for elective colectomy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m2 or above * patients with a history of hepatic or renal diseases * patients with second- or third-degree heart blocks * patients with coagulopathies * patients with history of hypersensitivity to local anesthetics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
morphine consumptionFrom the time of end of surgery till the pass of the first 24 hours postoperativelypostoperative total morphine consumption over 24 hours

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026