Skip to content

REhabilitation of MEMory Symptoms After BRain Concussion

REhabilitation of MEMory Symptoms After BRain Concussion

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06956417
Acronym
REMEMBR
Enrollment
184
Registered
2025-05-04
Start date
2025-07-02
Completion date
2029-04-30
Last updated
2026-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Concussion, Brain, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Functional cognitive disorder

Brief summary

Persistent memory symptoms after concussion are common, and likely perpetuated by unhelpful illness beliefs and coping behaviors. Results from a pilot study suggested that traditional cognitive rehabilitation and a novel cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) protocol were both associated with improvements in subjective memory functioning. The present study will more definitively compare the effectiveness of these interventions for improving subjective memory functioning after concussion.

Detailed description

The primary research aims of this study are to determine whether cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and cognitive compensatory strategy training (CCST) improves subjective memory functioning compared to usual care, and to compare the effectiveness of CBT and CCST. This study is a multisite three-armed randomized control trial (RCT) that will randomize adults with persistent memory symptoms following concussion to CBT, CCST, or a covert waitlist condition (2:2:1). Participants will be blinded to the other arms of the study and the study hypotheses.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive behavioral therapy

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is delivered by a psychologist over 10 individual (1:1) manualized videoconference sessions. The goal of this therapy is for participants to use their memory more normally (i.e., reduce avoidance and safety behaviors) and view memory lapses as less threatening.

BEHAVIORALCognitive rehabilitation

Cognitive compensatory strategy training (CCST), a traditional cognitive rehabilitation intervention, is delivered by a Occupational Therapist over 10 individual (1:1) manualized videoconference sessions. Participants optimize their use of current compensatory strategies and/or learn new ones suited to their needs and lifestyle. The goal is to minimize memory lapses in daily life.

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18-59 2. Concussion diagnosis confirmed with structured interview based on American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine diagnostic criteria 3. Concussion occurred between 6 and 36 months before enrollment 4. Ongoing memory concerns 5. Fluent in English 6. Stable access to a computer, tablet, or smartphone with internet capability

Exclusion criteria

1. Fail performance validity testing 2. Comorbid psychiatric or neurological disorder or is taking a medication that could fully account for their memory symptoms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire-Satisfaction scaleWeek 20Measures participants' concern, satisfaction, and overall appraisal of their memory ability. Participants rate their agreement with 18 statements. Total scores range from 0 to 72, with lower total scores indicating worse subjective memory functioning.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fear-Avoidance of Memory Loss ScaleWeek 1 and week 20Assesses fears and avoidance behaviors associated with memory decline. Participants rate 24 items on a 5-point scale, where the higher scores indicate greater memory concern and maladaptive coping.
Patient Global Impression of Change scaleWeek 20Participants rate how much their memory functioning has improved or declined overall since the beginning of the study, on a single item rated on a 7-point scale where the midpoint is no change.
Work and Social Adjustment ScaleWeek 1 and week 20Participants rate how much their condition interferes with their ability to carry out occupational and social activities across 5 items, on a scale from 1-7 where higher scores indicate more difficulty.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTNoah D Silverberg, PhD
noah.silverberg@ubc.ca6047341313
CONTACTTasha L Klotz, BA
tasha.klotz@ubc.ca6047341313
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNoah D Silverberg, PhD

University of British Columbia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 3, 2026