Skip to content

Hydraulic Pressure Lateral Sinus Lift Approach

Hydraulic Pressure Sinus Lift Versus Piezoelectric Lift Via Lateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06956313
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-05-04
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2025-03-01
Last updated
2025-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Piezoelectric Technique, Sinus Lifting

Keywords

advanced intelligence drill, Sinus lift, hydraulic pressure sinus lift, external sinus lift,, piezoelectric surgery, lateral approach

Brief summary

the study aims to assess the effectiveness of hydraulic pressure sinus lift via lateral wall approach, versus piezoelectric surgery in patients with deficient posterior maxilla.

Detailed description

This study involves a randomized clinical trial of 20 participants with less than 6 mm bone height in the posterior maxilla in need of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation using the lateral window approach. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups; the HPLT Group which include 10 patients who will undergo hydraulic pressure for osteotomy preparation for lateral sinus lifting technique, and the PSLT Group which include 10 patients managed using piezoelectric surgery. Clinical and radiographic assessment of bone augmentation, as well as intraoperative biological complications and postoperative complications were recorded.

Interventions

DEVICEHydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique

Hydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique

DEVICEPiezo-Surgical Lifting Technique

Piezo-Surgical Lifting Technique

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

patients were allocated in a 1:1 ratio using an on-site computer software system with concealed allocation through sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE). This was a double-blind study, so neither the statistical analyst nor the patients were aware of the surgical procedure

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The study included patient with deficient posterior maxilla with less than 6mm of bone height confirmed by a pre-operative tomographic scan. All healthy (ASA I, II) non- smoker patients were eligible for the study. The absence of uncontrolled diabetes, systemic illnesses, sinusitis, immune deficiency disorders, were also required for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with sinus infection, neoplasm or a large cyst of the sinus, or those who previously underwent a Caldwell-Luc surgery for the same surgical site were excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
radiographic appraisal of gain in alveolar bone height6 monthsPostoperative radiographic appraisal was conducted by an immediate postoperative CBCT, followed by other one after 6 postoperative month's. Measurements of the bone height was conducted from the alveolar crest to the floor of the maxillary sinus on a cross-section view of the CBCT (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY). Radiographic assessment of the amount of bone height gain in 6 months period was performed by comparing the bone height measurements between the 6 postoperative months' CBCT with the preoperative scan.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of membrane perforationUntil the end of the operationincidence of membrane perforation during the operation was assessed in both groups

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026