Skip to content

Classification and Prediction of Difficult Awake Tracheal Intubation With Flexible Bronchoscopes

Classification and Prediction of Difficult Awake Tracheal Intubation With Flexible Bronchoscopes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06953414
Acronym
AirWake
Enrollment
313
Registered
2025-05-01
Start date
2025-04-30
Completion date
2026-01-31
Last updated
2025-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Anesthesia, Bronchoscopy, Endoscopes, Intubation, Intratracheal

Keywords

Airway management, Classification, Flexible endoscopy guided intubation, Fibroptic guided intubation, Respiratory system, Laryngeal diseases, Health records

Brief summary

Airway management problems are key drivers for anesthesia-related adverse events. Awake tracheal intubation using flexible bronchoscopes with preserved spontaneous breathing (ATI:FB) is a recommended technique to manage difficult tracheal intubation in anesthesia, intensive care and emergency medicine. However, a prospective developed classification for this type of airway management is lacking. Due to the absence of a specifically tailored, validated classification for awake intubation with flexible bronchoscopes, many airway operators and institutions use classification tools that were originally developed for direct laryngoscopy, such as the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score or Cormack-Lehane classification, although their diagnostic performance for the classification of ATI:FB is unknown. This prospective model development and validation study aims to develop two multivariable prediction models: a diagnostic prediction model to classify difficult ATI:FB after ATI:FB has been performed and a second prognostic prediction model to predict the risk for difficult ATI:FB before ATI:FB is performed. An additional aim is to develop a machine learning algorithm to evaluate ATI:FB.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with an anticipated difficult airways scheduled for ATI:FB * Consent by the patient * Minimum 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Patients not scheduled for ATI:FB * Pregnant or breastfeeding patients * Consent not given by the patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difficult awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation1 hourDifficult airway alert issued by the airway operator following ATI:FB

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Coversion to another type of airway management1 hourObserved during airway management
Conversion from transnasal to transoral bronchoscopy or vice versa1 hourObserved during airway management
Percentage of glottic opening1 hourGrading of the best view obtained during laryngoscopy (%)
Glottic view1 hourGrading of the best view obtained using landmarks (6-stages)
Time to best glottic view1 hourRecorded during airway management (seconds)
Time to intubation1 hourRecorded during airway management (seconds)
Lowest oxygen saturation1 hourMeasured during airway management (%)
Endtidal CO21 hourFirst value measured after intubation (mmHg)
Airway obstructions requiring external manipulation1 hourObserved during airway management
Hypoxia1 hourObserved during airway management
First attempt success1 hourNumber of participants with successful ATI:FB with only one attempt
Number of bronchoscopy attempts1 hourObserved during airway management
Successful tube placement1 hourNumber of participants with successful tracheal tube placement
Successful ATI:FB1 hourNumber of participants with successful ATI:FB
Successful bronchoscopy1 hourNumber of participants with successful bronchoscopy
Cardiovascular event requiring intervention (hypotension/bradycardia)1 hourRelevant hypotension or bradycardia observed during airway management
Cardiovascular event requiring intervention (hypertension, tachycardia)1 hourRelevant hypertension or tachycardia observed during airway management
Additional manouvers and adjuncts used1 hourObserved during airway management
Patient discomfort during ATI:FB1 hourObserved during airway management
Airway-related complications1 hourObserved during airway management
Anaesthesia alert card issued1 hourAnaesthesia alert card issued by the airway operator
Recommendation for future airway management1 hourRecommendation documented by the airway operator after airway management
Richmond agitation-sedation Scale1 hourObserved during airway management (scale form -4 to 5 points; lower values indicate deeper sedation)
Subjective rating of difficulty of sedation, topicalisation, bronchoscopy and tube placement1 hourRating of the airway operator (visual analog scales \[0-100\]; lower values indicate better conditions)
Preparation time1 hourRecorded during airway management
Number of intubation attempts1 hourObserved during airway management

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactMartin Petzoldt, MD, FEAMS
m.petzoldt@uke.de04915222815932
Backup ContactVera Köhl, MD
v.koehl@uke.de

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026