Skip to content

Clinical Performance Evaluation of the Artificial Intelligence (AI)/ Machine Learning (ML) Technologies Utilized by the Origin Medical EXAM ASSISTANT

Prospective Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Performance of the Artificial Intelligence (AI)/ Machine Learning (ML) Technologies Utilized by the Origin Medical EXAM ASSISTANT

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06952439
Enrollment
551
Registered
2025-04-30
Start date
2025-03-19
Completion date
2025-05-19
Last updated
2025-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

First Trimester Pregnancy, To Validate the Clinical Performance of AI/ML Technologies in First-trimester Pregnant Participants

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, First Trimester Pregnancy, Ultrasound Imaging

Brief summary

A multicenter study will be conducted to assess the role of the AI/ML technologies of Origin Medical EXAM ASSISTANT (OMEA) in interpreting first-trimester fetal ultrasound examinations (11 weeks 0 days - 13 weeks 6 days). The performance of the AI-based system will be compared against the ground truth provided by an independent reading panel of maternal-fetal medicine physicians.

Detailed description

Study Brief: A multicenter, prospective observational study shall be conducted for the performance assessment and validation of the AI/ML technologies used in OMEA for the automated assessment of the first-trimester standard fetal ultrasound examinations. A prospective dataset of at least n=289 fetal ultrasound examinations shall be collected from pregnant participants with 11 weeks 0 days to 13 weeks 6 days weeks of gestational age (first trimester). Study Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the performance of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) / Machine Learning (ML) technologies utilized in OMEA for the: 1. Automated detection of standard diagnostic views in accordance with practice guidelines; 2. Automated verification of quality criteria required for the interpretation of diagnostic views in accordance with practice guidelines; Note: Quality criteria can pertain to the following: 1. Presence/Absence of anatomical landmarks/structures identified within the diagnostic views detected 2. Verification of imaging parameters (e.g., magnification) 3. Verification of clinical features (e.g., orientation of the fetus) 3. Automated caliper placements to obtain measurements in accordance with practice guidelines; Compliance with HIPAA Guidelines: All data obtained will be de-identified according to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) guidelines. The sponsor will be responsible for the storage, management, and security of the de-identified data collected. To protect patient privacy, all data collected for the study undergoes de-identification, ensuring the removal of any identifiable patient information. Each data entry is assigned a unique patient number, which serves as the sole identifier for the study. The link between patient numbers and patient identifiers is securely maintained and accessible only to the principal investigator (PI) and research staff at the study site location. This link is strictly confidential and is not shared with other individuals involved in the study. Its purpose is solely for the site's reference, enabling follow-up with medical records if required. By implementing these measures, the study maintains a high level of confidentiality, safeguarding patient identities while allowing for essential record-keeping and potential future reference. Sample Size Considerations: Approximately 500 participants will be recruited for the study, the details of which will be captured in a statistical analysis plan that will be submitted to the FDA. Study Design and Workflow: The data for the study is collected in line with the Data Collection Plan and the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The ARDMS performing the routine first-trimester ultrasound scan will be trained on the Image Acquisition Protocol and the Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM)/reading physicians performing clinical benchmarking will be guided through the Reading Physician Training Manual for ensuring standardized data capture and clinical benchmarking processes for evaluating the standalone performance of the AI/ML technologies used in OMEA. All the above mentioned documents will be submitted to the FDA as part of the premarket submission review. Phase 1: Data Capture: At each study site, informed consent will be provided and obtained from eligible participants, and the following information will be collected. Patient Details: 1. Fetal gestational age 2. Maternal age 3. Maternal BMI 4. Race/Ethnicity 5. Confirmation of diagnosis of fetal anomaly/syndrome prior to the study exam and post the study exam Site Details: 1. Site location 2. Sonographer name 3. Ultrasound scanner manufacturer and series Images and cines captured on the ultrasound machine (IUS): Registered diagnostic medical sonographers shall conduct routine first-trimester scans as per the Image Acquisition Protocol. Images and cines captured through the capture card (ICC): A screen capture/recording of the entire exam performed by the sonographer as per the Image Acquisition Protocol will be obtained, and the images/cines required for the study that correspond to IUS will be obtained. The independent research coordinator from Origin Medical for the study will review the screen recording and identify the frame/cine for each diagnostic view (ICC) that corresponds to IUS based time stamps. An independent quality reviewer from Origin Medical will verify whether the corresponding pair (i.e., captured on an ultrasound machine vs. obtained through screen recording) of frames/cine for each diagnostic view has been extracted or not. Phase 2: Clinical Benchmarking and Statistical Analysis All images/cines (IUS) from all patient exams that meet the study eligibility criteria will be pooled and randomized to prepare the ground truth by an independent Reading Panel (MFM physicians). AI/ML technologies of OMEA interpretation of ICC The frozen AL/ML technologies used in OMEA shall interpret the images/cines (ICC). For the sake of clarity, the ICC refers to the images/cines extracted from screen recordings using a capture card that correspond to the same images/cines as obtained by the ARDMS on the ultrasound machine. The following tasks shall be performed by the AI/ML technologies on ICC: 1. Automated detection of standard diagnostic views; 2. Automated verification of quality criteria required for interpretation of diagnostic views ; 3. Automated caliper placements to obtain fetal measurements; The performance of the AI/ML technologies used in the OMEA (on all ICC images/ cines that meet the study eligibility criteria) shall be compared against the ground truth for statistical analysis, i.e., against the majority consensus obtained from the Reading Panel for detection of diagnostic views, verification of quality criteria, performing fetal biometry measurements and ACEP grading of the images/cines.

Interventions

DEVICEImages and cines captured through the capture card (ICC)

A screen capture/recording of the entire exam performed by the ARDMS as per the Image Acquisition Protocol for the FDA Study will be obtained, and the images/cines required for the study that correspond to IUS shall be obtained. The independent research coordinator for the study will review the screen recording and identify the frame/cine for each diagnostic view (ICC) that corresponds to IUS based on the time stamps.

Sponsors

Origin Medical Systems, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Maternal age ≥ 18 years 2. BMI \< 40 kg/m2 3. Live non-anomalous singleton pregnancies 4. Gestational age between 11 weeks + 0 days and 13 weeks + 6 days, as determined by: Last menstrual period (LMP) or, Ultrasound report if the the LMP date is uncertain Note: Gestational age determination follows standard American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines. 5. Informed consent is obtained from the participant 6. Exams obtained as per the Image Acquisition Protocol

Exclusion criteria

1. Multiple Pregnancies 2. Cases with fetal demise or other fetal abnormalities observed/suspected after the ultrasound examination 3. Cases of planned diagnostic ultrasound follow-up exams within 2 weeks for known or suspected abnormality after the current ultrasound examination for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess whether the AI/ML technologies used in OMEA can achieve an acceptable sensitivity for identifying the diagnostic view11 weeks 0 days to 13 weeks 6 daysThe overall sensitivity and two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) will be determined using data pooled across diagnostic views. Note: The participant is assessed for the primary outcome on the same day of enrollment.
To assess whether the AI/ML technologies used in OMEA can achieve an acceptable sensitivity and consistency for verifying the quality criteria of a given image11 weeks 0 days to 13 weeks 6 daysThe overall sensitivity and two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) will be determined using data pooled across diagnostic views for quality criteria. Note: The participant is assessed for the primary outcome on the same day of enrollment.
To evaluate the performance of the OMEA AI/ML technologies with respect to facilitating the determination of quantitative measure of crown-rump length (CRL) and nuchal translucency (NT), complementary evaluations of agreement will be performed.11 weeks 0 days to 13 weeks 6 daysThe agreement and consistency of the AI/ML technologies used in OMEA to obtain quantitative measurements (i.e., CRL and NT) compared to the MFM physician average will be analyzed by applying Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Note: The participant is assessed for the primary outcome on the same day of enrollment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To assess the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of each of the individual diagnostic view of each of the individual quality criteria within each diagnostic view.11 weeks 0 days to 13 week 6 daysWe will evaluate the sensitivity and two-sided 95% CI (two-sided 90% CI) for each of the individual diagnostic planes and individual quality criteria within each diagnostic plane. Parallelly, specificity shall also be determined for the AI/ML technologies to accurately determine when a diagnostic view/quality criteria is not present, along with the associated 95% confidence interval. Note: The participant is assessed for the secondary outcome on the same day of enrollment.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the inter-observer agreement in the quantitative values of CRL and NT among the MFM physicians reading panel.11 weeks 0 days to 13 weeks 6 daysWe will analyze the inter-rater agreement in the quantitative values of CRL and NT among the three (3) MFM physicians during clinical benchmarking.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026