Skip to content

Effect of Molecular Hydrogen Inhalation on Metabolic Response During Low-intensity Exercise on a Bicycle Ergometer

Effect of Molecular Hydrogen Inhalation on Metabolic Response in Healthy Females During Low-intensity Exercise on a Bicycle Ergometer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06951789
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-04-30
Start date
2025-05-05
Completion date
2026-06-19
Last updated
2026-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy, Respiratory Quotient Measurement

Brief summary

This trial evaluates the effect of molecular hydrogen inhalation on metabolic response, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion in healthy females during 30 minutes of exercise on a bicycle ergometer.

Detailed description

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial is to assess the effect of molecular hydrogen inhalation on metabolic response during 20 min of rest and during exercise on a bicycle ergometer with a workload of 0.5 W/kg for 10 min, 0.75 W/kg for 10 min, and 1 W/kg for 10 min. The trial recruits healthy females aged 20-35 years and the planned sample size is 20. The trial consists of two experimental sessions, one using molecular hydrogen inhalation and the other using placebo inhalation. The washout period between sessions is one week. Randomization of the order of the sessions is performed using a computer random generator. Molecular hydrogen is produced using a hydrogen generator via electrolysis of water and administered through a mouthpiece. Ambient air is used for placebo inhalation. Molecular hydrogen is colorless, odorless, and tasteless, making it indistinguishable from placebo by the human senses. During the session, the following variables are measured: ventilation, oxygen uptake, respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion, and oxygen saturation. Energy expenditure, fat oxidation rate and carbohydrates oxidation rate are calculated from oxygen uptake and respiratory exchange ratio. Statistical analysis is performed at the 0.05 significance level and data are evaluated using analysis of variance for repeated measures with Fisher's post hoc tests.

Interventions

Hydrogen gas, purity \>99.9%, flow rate 600 ml/min (two generators 300 ml/min each).

OTHERPlacebo

Ambient air, flow rate 600 ml/min (two pumps 300 ml/min each).

Sponsors

Palacky University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Free of major diseases. * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Acute conditions contraindicating laboratory testing of exercise. * Cardiorespiratory disease. * Pharmacotherapy affecting metabolism. * Musculoskeletal problems.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory exchange ratioChange after 1 week of crossover.Respiratory exchange ratio is measured with Ergostik analyser (Geratherm Respiratory, Bad Kissinger, Germany) breath by breath during the session and averaged over 5 min windows for subsequent analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VentilationChange after 1 week of crossover.Ventilation is measured with Ergostik analyser (Geratherm Respiratory, Bad Kissinger, Germany) breath by breath during the session and averaged over 5 min windows for subsequent analysis.
Oxygen uptakeChange after 1 week of crossover.Oxygen uptake is measured with Ergostik analyser (Geratherm Respiratory, Bad Kissinger, Germany) breath by breath during the session and averaged over 5 min windows for subsequent analysis.
Heart rateChange after 1 week of crossover.Heart rate is recorded by Polar H10 chest strap (Polar, Kempele, Finland) during the session and averaged over 5 min windows for subsequent analysis.
Rating of perceived exertionChange after 1 week of crossover.Participants are asked to subjectively rate their perceived exertion at specified time points (at the end of rest, after 10, 20, and 30 min of exercise). The Borg's scale 6 (no exertion) and 20 (maximal exertion) is used.

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 26, 2026