Skip to content

Evaluation of the Biomechanics of Crowding and the Energetic Cost of Endurance Runners Unilateral Transtibial Amputees.

Evaluation of the Biomechanics of Crowding and the Energetic Cost of Endurance Runners Unilateral Transtibial Amputees According to the Stiffness of the Race-specific Prothesis.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06948695
Acronym
BLADENDURUN
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-04-29
Start date
2025-04-23
Completion date
2026-11-01
Last updated
2025-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputee, Healthy Volunteers, Prostheses

Keywords

Unilateral transtibial amputees, Endurance runners

Brief summary

Transtibial amputation accounts for 3,700 cases per year in France. Athletes can use sport blades made of carbon plate for improved energy restitution. Sports blades are adjusted according to the manufacturer's recommendations and the subjective experience of the ortho-prosthetist and patient. These adjustments are designed to optimize performance and comfort while reducing the risk of injury. This risk is all the greater when asymmetries between the healthy and affected limbs are large, exposing the healthy limb to large and repeated reaction forces.

Detailed description

Furthermore, one of the performance criteria for long-distance running is energy cost. While a reduction in this parameter has been observed in bilateral amputees, heterogeneous data are reported in unilateral amputees, depending on the level of expertise and sports blade settings. While studies have investigated the effects of running with a prosthesis under conditions representative of track running, few data are available on sports blades designed for long-distance running. It therefore seems important to be able to objectively assess the effects of a change in the stiffness of the sports blade on the energetics and biomechanics of running, in order to optimize practice and prevent associated traumas. Secondly, investigators believe it is important to verify that the biomechanical results obtained in the laboratory are applicable in the field, both on the road and on the unstable terrain encountered by trail runners.

Interventions

OTHERWarm-up

5-minute warm-up run on treadmill at a freely chosen speed

OTHERRandom blade test

4-minute run on a treadmill with a flat incline.

OTHERComfort speed test

1 min running test on an instrumented treadmill (Gaitway, H/P/Cosmos, Nußdorf, Germany) at comfort speed.

OTHEROutdoor random blade test

100-metre outdoor run at a comfort speed

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

prospective randomized cross-over study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, * Weighing less than 110 kg, in accordance with C-blade recommendations, * Subjects who have undergone a unilateral transtibial amputation, * Have been running with a sports blade for at least 3 months, over several sessions of at least 3 kilometers. * Subjects who have signed a written consent form, * Subjects affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects whose amputation is due to complications related to diabetes or atherosclerosis. * Subjects with chronic or central neurological pathologies * Subjects with cardiovascular disorders * Subjects with alcohol or drug dependency. * Pregnant or breast-feeding women * Subjects under court protection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxygen consumption measurementDay 14-minute flat run on a treadmill at comfort speed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kinematic analysisDay 1Slope-dependent kinematic analysis by measuring joint angles (in degrees), moments (Nm) and net joint forces at ankle, knee and hip (in Nm/Kg), ground reaction forces (in N/Kg) during a 1-minute run on different slopes (downhill -10%, flat, uphill +10%).
Cadence of running (in steps per minutes)Day 1Cadence of running according to slope (downhill -10%, flat, uphill +10%) and terrain, measured during a 1-minute run on a carpet
Stride length (in meters) of runningDay 1Stride length of running according to slope (downhill -10%, flat, uphill +10%) and terrain, measured during a 1-minute run on a carpet
Oxygen consumption measurementDay 14-minute up hill run (+10%), on a treadmill at comfort speed
Stride length (in metres) of runningDay 2Stride length (in metres)of running according to gradient (downhill -10%, flat, uphill +10%) and type of terrain, measured during a 100-metre run on roads and paths.
Leg muscle activity (mV)Day 1, 2Recording of leg muscle activity under all conditions using surface electromyographic recordings (Trigno wireless electromyogram (EMG) electrodes (Delsys, Natick, USA) made on the vastus lateralis, rectus femoris and gluteus medius muscles (Root Mean Square (RMS).
Subjective sensation recordingDay 1, 2Recording of the subjective sensation of perceived exertion at the end of each condition using a Borg scale ranging from 0 to 10. 0 = It is very very easy 10= so hard that I have to stop
Cadence (in steps per minute) of runningDay 2Cadence of running according to gradient (downhill -10%, flat, uphill +10%) and type of terrain, measured during a 100-metre run on roads and paths.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactDavid HUPIN, MD-PhD
david.hupin@chu-st-etienne.fr(0)4 77 82 83 00
Backup ContactLéonard FEASSON, MD-PhD
leonard.leasson@chu-st-etienne.fr(0)4 77 82 83 00

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026