Skip to content

Impact of Hip Strength Training on Jump and Throw Performance in Young Female Handball Players

Effects of Hip Strength Exercise Training on Jump Distance, Hip Muscle Strength and Throwing Performance in 15-19-Year-Old Female Handball Players

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06946459
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-04-27
Start date
2025-02-15
Completion date
2025-04-18
Last updated
2026-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Strength Training Effects

Keywords

Handball players, Strength training effects, Throwing performance, Jumping performance

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the effects of an 8-week Hip Strength Exercise Training program, implemented in addition to the athletes' regular training routines, on hip muscle strength, jump distance, and three-step jump shot performance in female handball players aged 15 to 19. Furthermore, the study seeks to explore the potential relationships between throwing performance and various physical parameters, including anthropometric measurements, handgrip strength, and body fat percentage.

Detailed description

Handball is a complex and multifactorial team sport determined not only by each player's individual performance but also by the tactical components and interactions within the team. Therefore, defining the game and identifying the key factors influencing performance remain challenging. Handball players must effectively coordinate basic motor skills such as running, jumping, pushing, and changing direction, along with handball-specific skills like passing, catching, controlling, and blocking, to execute shots or create optimal scoring opportunities for teammates. Since the winning team in handball is the one that scores the most goals, goal shooting is one of the most critical aspects of the game. A successful goal shot requires the ball to reach maximum velocity and be accurate enough to deceive the goalkeeper. The faster and more accurately the ball is thrown, the less time defenders and the goalkeeper have to react and intervene. In addition to throwing speed and accuracy, jump distance is also a significant factor influencing performance in handball matches. The most frequently used shot type in handball competitions is the jump shot. The energy produced during a jump shot originates from the force exerted against the ground. The higher the player jumps, the longer the flight time, increasing the likelihood of avoiding defensive blocks. Handball demands high levels of explosive strength, maximal strength, and muscular power in both the upper and lower extremities. While training programs are generally multidimensional, it is important to identify which muscle groups contribute most significantly to performance in order to optimize training approaches. This is because many handball-specific skills such as throwing, blocking, pushing, and holding require considerable strength and power output. The hip plays a critical role in handball shooting by initiating upper body movement and transferring momentum from the lower to the upper extremities. It provides a stable base for the upper body during the shot, thereby playing a significant role in shot performance. Well-designed hip strengthening programs have been shown to yield not only improvements in strength but also positive effects on secondary outcomes such as linear sprinting, agility, change of direction, and sport-specific performance metrics. The existing literature highlights a lack of sufficient research examining the relationship between physical capacity and throwing performance. There is a particular need for studies investigating the effects of muscle strength, jump distance, and overall physical fitness on throwing performance. Moreover, it has been noted that studies focusing on female handball players are relatively limited compared to those involving males, underscoring the need for further research in this area. In this study, the researchers aim to investigate the effects of an 8-week Hip Strength Exercise Training program, implemented in addition to routine training, on hip muscle strength, jump distance, and three-step jump shot performance in female handball players aged 15 to 19. Additionally, the researchers aim to examine the relationships between throwing performance and anthropometric measurements, handgrip strength, and body fat percentage. It is hypothesized that the Hip Strength Exercise Training program will positively contribute to throwing performance by improving hip muscle strength, throwing speed, throwing accuracy, and jump distance. Accordingly, it is suggested that low-cost, easily applicable hip strengthening exercises utilizing resistance bands can be integrated into training routines and contribute to the development of injury prevention strategies. Based on the above, the hypotheses are as follows: Hypothesis 1: Hip Strength Exercise Training in handball players has a positive effect on hip muscle strength. Hypothesis 2: Hip Strength Exercise Training in handball players has a positive effect on throwing accuracy. Hypothesis 3: Hip Strength Exercise Training in handball players has a positive effect on throwing speed. Hypothesis 4: Hip Strength Exercise Training in handball players has a positive effect on jump distance.

Interventions

OTHERExercise

Participants in the Hip Strength Exercise Training group performed structured hip strengthening exercises using resistance bands in addition to their regular handball and strength training programs. The training was implemented three times per week for 8 weeks, with one rest day between sessions, and was conducted before regular handball practices. The exercises focused on activating and strengthening the hip muscles through simple, well-structured movements. Resistance bands were chosen due to their portability, cost-effectiveness, and suitability for adolescent athletes. This method ensured a safe training environment, reduced the risk of overload, and allowed for proper execution and control of the exercises.

Sponsors

Istanbul University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

In this study, the participants were not blinded to their group assignment, as it was evident which group they belonged to (Hip Strength Exercise Training Group or Control Group) based on the intervention. However, the outcomes assessors were blinded to group allocation to reduce potential bias in the measurement of the outcomes. This masking ensured that the evaluation of the effects of the intervention remained unbiased.

Intervention model description

In our study, the athletes were randomly assigned to two groups: the Hip Strength Exercise Training Group and the Control Group. The Hip Strength Exercise Training Group consists of handball players who were planned to receive hip strength exercise training three times a week for 8 weeks following the initial assessments. The Control Group, on the other hand, represents handball players who were instructed to continue with their regular handball training for 8 weeks after the initial assessments.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
15 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Signing the Informed Voluntary Consent Form by agreeing to voluntarily participate in the study * Being a handball player aged between 15-19 years * Being female * Having reached menarche * Having the ability to understand and speak

Exclusion criteria

* Having sustained an extremity injury in the last 6 months * Having a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 kg/m² (obesity) * Having a cardiovascular, neurological, or pulmonary disease * Experiencing hip pain related to loading and fatigue, or hip pain due to muscle and spasms * Presence of bursitis, synovitis, arthritis, or osteomyelitis in the hip

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Throwing VelocityBaseline, Week 8Throwing velocity was measured using the Doppler radar gun (Bushnell Speedster III). Participants performed jump shots from behind the 9-meter line using the three-step technique. The average ball speed (km/h) from five valid throws to each corner of the goal was recorded. The radar gun was placed 4 meters behind the free throw line and aligned with the release height and target corner to ensure measurement accuracy.
Throwing AccuracyBaseline, Week 8Throwing accuracy was evaluated by targeting 50 cm circular zones placed in the four corners of a standard goal. Five throws per corner were completed (a total of 20 throws). The reported values in the data table represent the mean number of successful throws per target zone, calculated by dividing the total successful throws by the number of zones. The possible score for this reported mean ranges from 0 to 5. Higher scores indicate better throwing accuracy per corner.
Isokinetic Hip Strength ParametersBaseline and Week 8Hip concentric strength evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex Humac Norm) at a speed of 180°/s. The test involves 4 maximum concentric contractions following 5 practice trials. The reported values represent the peak torque normalized to body weight (%BW). Multiple sub-measurements for different muscle groups and time points (Baseline and Week 8) are presented as separate rows within the single data table for comprehensive evaluation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anthropometric MeasurementsBaseline (15-18 February 2025)Circumference and length measurements (shoulder, upper arm, forearm, wrist, arm span, etc.) will be performed according to International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry protocols using flexible fabric measuring tapes. Dominant side was used for all anthropometric measurements.
Body Fat PercentageBaseline (15 -18 February 2025)Body fat percentage will be assessed using the bioelectrical impedance analysis device (Tanita TBF-300 M).
Hand Grip StrengthBaseline (15 -18 February 2025)Hand grip strength will be measured using a hydraulic hand dynamometer (Jamar). The participant will perform the test with the dominant hand.
Countermovement Jump DistanceBaseline (15-18 February 2025) and after 8-week intervention (15-18 April 2025)Vertical jump performance will be evaluated through the modified counter movement jump test, measured using a digital jump meter (Takei), to assess explosive lower-body power.
Single Leg Vertical Jump (SLVJ) DistanceBaseline (15-18 February 2025) and after 8-week intervention (15-18 April 2025)Vertical jump distance on the dominant leg will be measured using a digital jump meter (Takei) to assess unilateral leg power.
Single Leg Horizontal Jump (SLHJ) DistanceBaseline (15-18 February 2025) and after 8-week intervention (15-18 April 2025)Horizontal jump distance on the dominant leg will be evaluated using a flat measurement tape fixed to the ground to assess functional leg strength and coordination.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORZümre H Taşçı, MSc student

Istanbul University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSertaç Yakal, Dr.

Istanbul University

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited between February and March 2025 from Üsküdar Municipality Sports Club, Cent College Sports Club, and Avcılar Municipality Sports Club in Istanbul. Female handball players aged 15-19 years were informed about the study procedures, and informed consent was obtained from both athletes and their legal guardians prior to participation.

Pre-assignment details

Forty female handball players aged 15-19 years who met the inclusion criteria provided informed consent and completed baseline assessments. Participants were randomized into two groups (n=20 Hip Strength Exercise Training; n=20 Control). During the study, three athletes in each group discontinued due to injuries or missed sessions. The study was completed with 34 participants (17 in each group).

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
32 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
BMI22.14 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 203 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 1, 2026