Skip to content

Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-midazolam Sedation in Awake Fiberoptic Intubation in Suspected Difficult Airway

Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-midazolam Sedation in Awake Fiberoptic Intubation With Topical Anesthesia in Suspected Difficult Airway

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06946212
Enrollment
34
Registered
2025-04-27
Start date
2023-05-15
Completion date
2024-04-04
Last updated
2025-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Awake Fiberoptic Intubation

Keywords

Sedation, Awake fiberoptic intubation

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to obtain the optimal patient's comfort and cooperation during awake fiberoptic intubation with prototype device. The main question it aims to answer is: Which drug provides better sedative effect during awake fiberoptic intubation, dexmedetomidine or ketamine- midazolam combination with prototype supraglottic topical anaesthesia device?

Detailed description

Awake fiberoptic intubation is the gold standard technique for managing patients with anticipated difficult airway. Conscious sedation and topical anesthesia is desirable, not only to make the procedure more tolerable and comfortable for the patient but also to ensure optimal intubating conditions. Ideal Topical Anesthesia and sedation regime for Awake fiberoptic intubation should provide comfort, cooperation, hemodynamic stability along with maintenance of spontaneous respiration. Several sedative agents have been assessed in previous studies) for this purpose (like benzodiazepine ,opioids ,ketamine , propofol and dexmedetomidine So it is important to know which has the best sedative effect dexmedetomidine or ketamine - midazolam combination with undisturbed respiratory function .

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

In Dexmedetomidine group: patients received an intravenous dose of dexmedetomidine at 1 mcg/kg over 10 min in 100 mL normal saline followed by continous infusion of dexmedetomidine at 0.2mcg/kg/h up to 0.7mcg/kg/hr till reaching Ramsay sedation score 2-3

In Ketamine Midazolam group: patients received midazolam 0.02 mg /kg IV then 2 minutes later take ketamine 0.25 mg/kg IV and we will repeated this mixture till reaching Ramsay sedation score 2-3

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient consent * Age 21 to 60 years * Both male and female * ASA I and ASA II * BMI : ((18.5 - 35 kg/ m2 )), * Patient scheduled to undergo elective surgeries under general anesthesia. * Patient with suspected difficult airway.

Exclusion criteria

* Sever chronic disease (cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and hepatic). * Coagulopathies * Mental retarted or psychiatric disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient toleranceDuring the procedure of awake fiberoptic intubationPatient tolerance assessed by independent observer by a five-point fiberoptic intubation comfort score (1 = no reaction, 2 = slight grimacing, 3 = heavy grimacing, 4 = verbal objection, 5 = defensive movement of head and hands

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation scoreDuring the procedure of awake fiberoptic intubationIntubation score was assessed by vocal cord movement (1 = open, 2 = moving, 3 = closing, 4 = closed) and coughing (1 = none, 2 = one gag or cough only, 3 = \>1 gag or cough, but acceptable conditions, 4 = unacceptable conditions)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation timefrom introduction of fibroscope till endotracheal tube in place confirmed.Intubation time: from introduction of fibroscope till endotracheal tube in place confirmed.
Mean arterial blood pressureat five different times (baseline, 2 min after sedation, at the beginning of fiberscopy as it passes through the nostril, after advancing the ETT through the nasopharynx and 2 min after endotracheal intubationMean arterial blood pressure ( MAP Measured in mmHg) which assessed at five different times (baseline, 2 min after sedation, at the beginning of fiberscopy as it passes through the nostril, after advancing the ETT through the nasopharynx and 2 min after endotracheal intubation).
Heart rateHeart rate assessed at five different times (baseline, 2 min after sedation, at the beginning of fiberscopy as it passes through the nostril, after advancing the ETT through the nasopharynx and 2 min after endotracheal intubationHeart rate ( HR Measured in beat/ minute) which assessed at five different times (baseline, 2 min after sedation, at the beginning of fiberscopy as it passes through the nostril, after advancing the ETT through the nasopharynx and 2 min after endotracheal intubation).
Oxygen saturationAt five different times (baseline, 2 min after sedation, at the beginning of fiberscopy as it passes through the nostril, after advancing the ETT through the nasopharynx and 2 min after endotracheal intubationOxygen saturation ( spO2 Measured in percentage) which assessed at five different times (baseline, 2 min after sedation, at the beginning of fiberscopy as it passes through the nostril, after advancing the ETT through the nasopharynx and 2 min after endotracheal intubation).

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026