Balance Disorders, Low Back Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Kinesiology Taping, Nonspecific Low Back Pain, Physiotherapy
Brief summary
This study aims to examine the effects of kinesiology taping on balance and functional ability in individuals with nonspecific low back pain. Nonspecific low back pain is a common condition that is not linked to a specific medical cause and is often associated with balance problems, reduced physical function, and psychological challenges. In this study, 35 patients aged between 18 and 65 were included. One group received kinesiology taping along with physiotherapy, while the other group received only physiotherapy.
Detailed description
Nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition that cannot be attributed to a specific pathology. It often leads to limitations in functional activities, impaired balance, and psychological distress, such as depressive symptoms. This study investigates the effects of kinesiology taping on balance and functional outcomes in individuals diagnosed with NSLBP. The study was conducted on 35 participants aged 18 to 65 years. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the intervention group received kinesiology taping in combination with physiotherapy, while the control group received only physiotherapy treatment. Various outcome measures were used to assess the effects of the interventions, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain intensity, Functional Rating Index (FRI), Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), and the Flamingo Balance Test.
Interventions
DEVICEKinesiology Taping
Kinesiology taping was applied to the lumbar area of the participants in the intervention group. The taping aimed to improve posture, reduce pain, and enhance balance and functional performance.
OTHERPhysiotherapy
The physiotherapy program included therapeutic exercises and physical modalities (such as stretching, strengthening, and posture training) tailored for individuals with nonspecific low back pain.
Sponsors
Elif Dilara Durmaz
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Masking description
No masking was applied. Both participants and investigators were aware of the assigned interventions.
Intervention model description
Model Description: Participants were assigned to either an intervention group receiving kinesiology taping combined with physiotherapy or a control group receiving physiotherapy alone. Both groups were treated in parallel and assessed pre- and post-intervention.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients aged between 18 and 65 years * Diagnosis of nonspecific low back pain * Duration of low back pain longer than 6 weeks * Ability to attend an outpatient physiotherapy program
Exclusion criteria
* History of spinal surgery * Presence of neurological deficits on physical examination * Contraindication to kinesiology taping * Pregnancy * Cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases that contraindicate exercise * History of lower extremity surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Functional Rating Index (FRI) score | Baseline (Day 1): Initial assessment (Day 1 of the study) 3 weeks post-intervention: Second assessment, 3 weeks after the intervention (after the treatment program) | Functional status was assessed using the Functional Rating Index (FRI) to evaluate the level of functional disability related to nonspecific low back pain. A decrease in the score indicates improved functional status. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain | Baseline (Day 1): Initial assessment (Day 1 of the study) 3 weeks post-intervention: Second assessment, 3 weeks after the intervention (after the treatment program) | Pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale. A decrease in score indicates reduced pain severity. |
| Change in Flamingo Balance Test (FBT) score | Baseline (Day 1): Initial assessment (Day 1 of the study) 3 weeks post-intervention: Second assessment, 3 weeks after the intervention (after the treatment program) | Balance was assessed using the Flamingo Balance Test. Improved performance indicates better postural control and balance. |
| Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score | Baseline (Day 1): Initial assessment (Day 1 of the study) 3 weeks post-intervention: Second assessment, 3 weeks after the intervention (after the treatment program) | Psychological status was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory. A decrease in score reflects improved mood and reduced depressive symptoms. |
| Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score | Baseline (Day 1): Initial assessment (Day 1 of the study) 3 weeks post-intervention: Second assessment, 3 weeks after the intervention (after the treatment program) | Disability level related to low back pain was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index. A decrease in score reflects improved functional ability. |
| Change in Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) score | Baseline (Day 1): Initial assessment (Day 1 of the study) 3 weeks post-intervention: Second assessment, 3 weeks after the intervention (after the treatment program) | Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Nottingham Health Profile. A decrease in score indicates better quality of life. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed