Skip to content

A Comparative Study Between Laryseal Pro Extraglottic Device and Ambu Aura Gain Laryngeal Mask as a Conduit for Fiberoptic Tracheal Intubation in Pediatric Population

A Comparative Study Between Laryseal Pro Extraglottic Device and Ambu Aura Gain Laryngeal Mask as a Conduit for Fiberoptic Tracheal Intubation in Pediatric Population: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06945029
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-04-25
Start date
2025-04-15
Completion date
2026-04-01
Last updated
2025-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laryseal Pro and Ambu Aura Gain as Conduits for Fiberoptic Endotracheal Intubation

Brief summary

This study aims to compare between Laryseal Pro and Ambu Aura Gain extraglottic devices as conduits for fiberoptic endotracheal intubation regarding time of endotracheal intubation in pediatric population.

Detailed description

Airway management is a skill that must be mastered by all anesthesiologists. Since the introduction of the extraglottic airway devices (EADs) in the early 1980s, the EAD has become a central element in the management of airway in adults and children. Some of the EADs are specially designed to allow endotracheal intubation whether blindly or with the use of fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB). So, with the use of EAD, it is possible to provide adequate oxygenation and at the same time perform fibreoptic bronchoscopy-guided trans-device intubation, providing less hemodynamic stress response and less postoperative complications. As patient's safety always comes first, the use of flexible bronchoscopes became more widespread, strong literature favored visualization of the glottis over blind intubation. So, the use of the intubating EADs as aconduit for fiberoptic intubation is favoured over blind intubation. In addition, FOB guided intubation through EAD is a central step in the algorithm of the expected as well as the unexpected difficult airway in children. The Ambu Aura Gain is a second-generation EAD which was presented in the clinical field in 2018. It is characterized by a wide inner diameter tunnel which has a C shaped curve with an angle guiding the endotracheal tube (ETT) into the laryngeal inlet. The presence of gastric access through a second port helps to vent the stomach and for gastric suctioning. In a previous study The Ambu Aura Gain has been shown to be an effective conduit for FOB guided intubation regarding feasibility of FOB-guided intubation, oropharyngeal leak pressure, gastric leak pressure and fibreoptic view in small children. Laryseal Pro is a novel device and a new generation of EADs that was developed in 2018. It is believed to be a method for rapid, secure airway management which improves patient safety with gastric access. It has a catheter channel for efficient removal of fluids and gastric content, reducing risk of aspiration and integrated fenestrated flap that protects from blockage with minimal increase in flow resistance. Besides, it elevates the epiglottis for easy trauma-free ETT or bronchoscope insertion. In spite of that, it's clinical performance and efficacy as a conduit for fiberoptic tracheal intubation in pediatric population hasn't been studied by any study in literature till the present time. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of laryseal Pro EGA in pediatric population. In this study we will compare between two extra glottic devices, Laryseal Pro and Ambu Aura Gain regarding clinical performance and efficacy with respect to the time of endotracheal intubation through fibreoptic, laryngeal view grade, airway seal pressure, success rate of intubation, number of attempts of intubation, number of attempts of SGA insertion and complications in pediatric population.

Interventions

compare between Laryseal Pro and Ambu Aura Gain extraglottic devices as conduits for fiberoptic endotracheal intubation regarding time of endotracheal intubation in pediatric population.

compare between Laryseal Pro and Ambu Aura Gain extraglottic devices as conduits for fiberoptic endotracheal intubation regarding time of endotracheal intubation in pediatric

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

A prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age starting from 4 years to 8 years. * Both genders. * ASA physical status class I-ll. * Apparently anatomically normal with normal percentile growth chart, not suspected to have difficult airway. * Scheduled for day case surgeries more than one hour under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* Parents refusal. * Abnormality in head and neck or craniofacial anomalies as Piere Robbin syndrome, facial trauma, head and neck tumours, swellings and hemangiomas. * Patients at risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration such as patients with hiatus hernia, GERD or DM. * Abnormal or contraindicated cervical spine flexion/extension/rotation. * Allergy to any EAD components. * Any active respiratory or cardiac disease and metabolic disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The FOB-guided intubation time using the EAD in secondsFirst 10 seconds of intubationthe time elapsing between circuit disconnection from the EAD for the purpose of bronchoscope-guided intubation till reconnecting the circuits to the ETT and appearance of capnography waves.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactOmnia Y Kamel, Doctorate degree
omniayehiakamel90@gmail.com01270130326
Backup ContactEman S Hassan Mohammed, Resident
emankreem10@gmail.com01113342616

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026