One Hundred Patients Aged 65 and Older Who Underwent Emergency General Surgical Interventions, Clinical Utility of These Scoring Systems, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Appendicitis Acute, Emergency Surgery Patients
Conditions
Keywords
Emergency surgery, Frailty assessment, Mortality prediction
Brief summary
Frailty assessment tools and comorbidity indices play a crucial role, particularly in predicting outcomes for elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery. The Emergency Surgery Frailty Index (EmSFI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and the Flemish version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (fTRST) are considered valuable tools that help understand patients perioperative risk profiles. This study aims to investigate the accuracy and clinical utility of these scoring systems in predicting mortality in individuals aged 65 and older undergoing emergency surgery
Interventions
This study aims to investigate the accuracy and clinical utility of these scoring systems in predicting mortality in individuals aged 65 and older undergoing emergency surgery.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients aged 65 years and older who underwent emergency abdominal surgery
Exclusion criteria
* Multiple hospitalizations for the same pathology, * Initial admission at another facility, * History of emergency abdominal surgery before the study period, * Terminal-stage cancer * Emergency reoperations following elective surgery, * Surgery while in the intensive care unit.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Predicting 30-Day Mortality in Elderly Emergency Surgery Patients: A Comparative Study of CCI, EmSFI, and fTRST Scoring Systems | From enrollment to the postoperative at 1 month | This study aims to investigate the accuracy and clinical utility of these scoring systems in predicting mortality in individuals aged 65 and older undergoing emergency surgery. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)