Skip to content

Comparison of Two Gait Re-training Modalities During a Cardiac Rehabilitation Stay: Benefit of Orienteering Walking

Comparison of Two Gait Re-training Modalities During a Cardiac Rehabilitation Stay: Benefit of Orienteering Walking

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06941597
Acronym
CAMCO
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-04-24
Start date
2025-04-28
Completion date
2025-10-05
Last updated
2025-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD), Congenital Heart Disease, Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), Heart Failure

Keywords

cardiovascular diseases, cardiac rehabilitation, active walking, orienteering, heart rate

Brief summary

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in France for women and the second leading cause of death for men after cancer. They cause around 140,000 deaths every year, or almost 400 people every day throughout France. CVD also accounts for over a million hospital admissions a year, 160,000 of which are attributable to heart failure. At present, cardiovascular rehabilitation centres mainly use exercise training methods based on sessions on cycloergometers and active walking (walking on a track and/or treadmill). Convinced of the added value of Orienteering, we have included it in our routine treatment as part of our Cardiac Rehabilitation programme, in addition to sessions on cycloergometers and active walking since 2021. As there is little literature on the subject in our population of interest, the aim of this study is to provide evidence of the relevance of orienteering in the cardiac rehabilitation programme. We hypothesise that orienteering induces a similar cardiac response, amount of physical activity and perception of symptoms compared with an active walking session, while providing greater enjoyment of the activity.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Univ Brest, Laboratory ORPHY, F-29200 Brest, France
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fondation Ildys
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with stabilised heart disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, post-operative stay after cardiac surgery, congenital heart disease, patients at high cardiovascular risk and obliterative arteritis of the lower limbs; * Who have been informed and do not object to the study; * Over 18 years of age; * Participating in a cardiac rehabilitation programme; * With a walking distance of less than 3,600 metres; * Able to understand and comply with the requirements of the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breast-feeding women * Persons under guardianship or trusteeship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To compare the average heart rate between an active walking session and an orientation walking session during the cardiac rehabilitation stay.once during the second and third week of cardiac rehabilitationAverage heart rate measured during the active walking session and the orienteering race.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the performance of the physical activity performed during the active walking versus orienteering session.once during the second and third week of cardiac rehabilitationPhysical activity performance will be measured for each session by the total number of steps taken during active walking and orienteering.
Compare the perception of effort between the active walking, orienteering and cycloergometer sessions.once during the second and third week of cardiac rehabilitationPerceived motivation to carry out the activity using a Likert scale from 0 to 5. The Likert scale is a semantic scoring system, generally made up of 5 or 7 items, which is used in surveys to measure and evaluate perceptions, attitudes and opinions.
To compare the intensity of effort between the active walking, orienteering and cycloergometer sessions.once during the second and third week of cardiac rehabilitationThe maximum heart rate (bpm) will be collected for each of the three sessions.
To compare the desire to continue physical activity between the active walking, orienteering and cycloergometer sessions.once during the second and third week of cardiac rehabilitationThe desire to continue physical activity between the three physical activities will be measured by a Likert scale from 0 to 5. The Likert scale is a semantic rating system, generally composed of 5 or 7 items, which is used in surveys to measure and evaluate perceptions, attitudes and opinions.
Compare the heart rate kinetics during the three sessions (orienteering, active walking and cycloergometer).once during the second and third week of cardiac rehabilitationChanges in heart rate over the three sessions (recorded every 5 minutes for 50 minutes for each session)
Compare the sensation of pleasure between the active walking, orienteering and cycloergometer sessions.once during the second and third week of cardiac rehabilitationThe feeling of pleasure for the three activity sessions will be measured on a Likert scale from 0 to 5. The Likert scale is a semantic rating system, generally composed of 5 or 7 items, which is used in surveys to measure and evaluate perceptions, attitudes and opinions.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026