Skip to content

3D Interlocking Miniplates in Fixation of Mandibular Fractures in the Mental Foramen Region: A Split-mouth Study

3D Interlocking Miniplates Versus Conventional Miniplates in Fixation of Mandibular Fractures in the Mental Foramen Region: A Split-mouth Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06939010
Acronym
Interlocking
Enrollment
12
Registered
2025-04-22
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2025-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Fractures, Miniplate

Keywords

Mental nerve, conventional miniplates, 3D Interlocking, mandibular parasymphyseal fracture

Brief summary

the study aims to compare 3D Interlocking miniplates with conventional miniplates in management of mandibular parasymphyseal fractures both clinically and radiographically.

Detailed description

A total of 12 patients with recent bilateral parasymphyseal mandibular fractures were treated with 3D Interlocking miniplates on one side and with conventional two miniplates in the other side. Clinical evaluations were carried at multiple intervals up to 6 weeks postoperatively, with radiographic assessments performed immediately after surgery and at 12 weeks to measure mean bone density at the fracture line

Interventions

DEVICE3d-interlocking miniplate

3d-interlocking miniplate

double miniplates in the conventional configuration

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Fracture sides were allocated in a 1:1 ratio using an on-site computer software system with concealed allocation through sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE). Group A was treated with 3D-interlocking miniplate in one side, and Group B with conventional double miniplates configration in the other side.

Intervention model description

Split-mouth

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with recent bilateral mandibular fracture located in the mental foramina region. * adults without gender predilection who agreed to follow-up, * fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation, and * those medically fit for general anesthesia were included

Exclusion criteria

* medically compromised patients, * fractures with infection, * pathological or old fractures, * completely edentulous patients, * comminuted fractures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic evaluation for the assessment of mean bone density at the fracture line12 weeksMean bone density at the fracture line was assessed using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan in Hounsfield Units (HU)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical evaluation for Intra-fragmentary mobility6 weeksIntra-fragmentary mobility was evaluated by bimanual palpation at the fracture site

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026