Skip to content

Investigational Study of SWM-831 to Treat Moderate and Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Arteries

Prospective, Multi-center, Single-arm Investigational Study of SWM-831 to Treat Moderate and Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Arteries

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06938854
Enrollment
81
Registered
2025-04-22
Start date
2025-03-10
Completion date
2028-03-01
Last updated
2025-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Brief summary

Disrupt PAD Japan is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm study of SWM-831 to treat moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal arteries, prior to DCB or stenting.

Detailed description

Up to 60 subjects at up to 10 sites in Japan will be enrolled in the femoropopliteal clinical study with moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal artery disease presenting with Rutherford Category 2 - 5 of the target limb. Two additional cohorts \[Iliac and BTK (Below-the-Knee)\] will enroll a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 15 subjects each with moderate and severely calcified iliac disease with a Rutherford Category (RC) 2 - 5 and a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 15 subjects with moderate and severely calcified BTK lesions with a Rutherford Category (RC) 2 - 5 will be enrolled and followed through 12 months. The estimated study duration for these cohorts is approximately 24 months. Study subjects will be followed through discharge, 30 days, 6, and 12 months.

Interventions

DEVICEPeripheral Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL)

For the Disrupt PAD Japan study, the Shockwave Medical Peripheral IVL System (SWM-831) is intended for lithotripsy enhanced balloon dilatation of lesions, including calcified lesions, in the peripheral vasculature, including the femoropopliteal arteries.

Sponsors

Iqvia Pty Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shockwave Medical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The objective of the study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of IVL to treat moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal arteries, prior to DCB or stenting.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria: Subjects are required to meet all of the following inclusion criteria in order to be enrolled in the clinical study: 1. Subject is able and willing to comply with all assessments in the study. 2. Subject or subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate and has signed the approved consent form. 3. Age of subject is ≥ 18. Note: If a subject is under 20 years, voluntary agreement shall be obtained from both the subject and the subject's representative or legal guardian using the written consent form. 4. Rutherford Clinical Category 2, 3, 4, or 5 of the target limb. 5. Estimated life expectancy \> 1 year. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria: Subjects are required to meet all of the following inclusion criteria in order to be enrolled in the clinical study. For lesion characteristics, each target lesion must meet eligibility. 1. One target lesion that is located in a native, de novo superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal artery (popliteal artery extends to and ends proximal to the ostium of the anterior tibial artery). \<Not applicable to iliac or BTK cohort\> 2. Target lesion reference vessel diameter (RVD) is between 4.0 mm and 8.0 mm by investigator visual estimate. \<Not applicable to iliac or BTK cohort\> 3. Target lesion with ≥ 70% stenosis by investigator visual estimate. 4. Target lesion length is ≤ 200 mm by investigator visual estimate. Target lesion can be all or part of the 200 mm treated zone. 5. Subject has at least one patent tibial vessel on the target limb with runoff to the foot, defined as no stenosis ≥ 50%. 6. Calcification is determined to be grade 2 - 4 (unilateral calcification ≥ 5 cm, bilateral wall calcification \< 5 cm, and bilateral calcification ≥ 5 cm, respectively), as defined by PACSS (Peripheral Artery Calcification Scoring System). \<Not applicable to iliac and BTK cohort\> Angiographic Inclusion Criteria specific to Iliac Arteries 1. Target lesion located in the native, de novo common or external iliac artery. 2. Target lesion reference vessel diameter (RVD) is between 5.0 mm and 10.0 mm by investigator visual estimate. 3. Evidence of PACSS calcification grade 2 - 4 and non-dilatable lesion indicating presence of calcium. Note: Non-dilatable lesion requires attempted treatment with PTA during the index procedure with residual stenosis ≥ 50% and no serious angiographic complication. Angiographic Inclusion Criteria specific to BTK Arteries 1. Target lesion from the native, de novo distal segment of the popliteal artery to the ankle joint. 2. Target lesion reference vessel diameter (RVD) is between 2.0 mm and 4.0 mm by investigator visual estimate. 3. Evidence of PACSS calcification grade 2 - 4 and non-dilatable lesion indicating presence of calcium. Note: Non-dilatable lesion requires attempted treatment with PTA during the index procedure with residual stenosis ≥ 50% and no serious angiographic complication. General

Exclusion criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects with Procedural SuccessDay 0Primary Endpoint for Femoropopliteal: Procedural success is defined as residual stenosis \< 50% without ≥ grade D dissections, prior to Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) or stenting for the treated target lesion (core lab assessed)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual stenosis < 50% without ≥ grade D dissectionsDay 0Femoropopliteal Technical Success defined as residual stenosis \< 50% without ≥ grade D dissections (core lab assessed) at the final timepoint (after DCB or stenting).
Residual stenosis < 30% without ≥ grade D dissectionsDay 0Femoropopliteal Technical Success defined as residual stenosis \< 30% without ≥ grade D dissections (core lab assessed) at the final timepoint (after DCB or stenting)
Number of participants with freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) CEC adjudicated and freedom from restenosis as determined by duplex-derived peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≤ 2.4, assessed by the DUS core lab.At 6 months and 12 months post-procedurePrimary patency at 6 and 12 months defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) CEC adjudicated and freedom from restenosis as determined by duplex-derived peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≤ 2.4, assessed by the DUS core lab. \- CD-TLR is defined as any revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI \> 20% or \> 0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion ≥ 50% at the target lesion site.
Rate of ≥ grade D dissections, perforation, distal embolization, slow flow or acute vessel closureDay 0Serious angiographic complications defined as the rate of ≥ grade D dissections, perforation, distal embolization, slow flow or acute vessel closure at the final procedural timepoint, as assessed by the angiographic core lab.
Number of participants with change in Ankle brachial index (ABI) or Toe brachial index (TBI)At 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-procedureAnkle brachial index (ABI) or Toe brachial index (TBI) at 30 days, 6, and 12 months reported as change from baseline
Number of participants with change in Rutherford CategoryAt 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-procedureRutherford Category at 30 days, 6, 12 months reported as change from baseline
Number of participants with Major Adverse EventAt 30 days, 6 months and 12 months post-procedureMajor Adverse Event (MAE) at 30 days, 6 and 12 months Clinical Events Committee adjudicated (as a composite and individual components), defined as: \- Cardiovascular death \- Clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) \- Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle)

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026