Skip to content

Imaging and Treatment Planning for Cardiac Radioablation

Imaging and Treatment Planning for Cardiac Radioablation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06938074
Acronym
ITPCR
Enrollment
15
Registered
2025-04-22
Start date
2025-11-01
Completion date
2026-09-01
Last updated
2025-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemia, Myocardial, Ventricular Tachycardia, Monomorphic, Ventricular Tachycardia (V-Tach)

Keywords

Cardiac radioablation, Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation, Ischemic fibrosis, Late iodine enhancement CT, CT perfusion, Late gadolinium enhanced MRI

Brief summary

Cardiac radioablation is a new treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT), which uses beams of radiation to treat heart scar that causes VT. To identify the scar areas, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) imaging are often used. These are both types of medical imaging that allow clinicians to examine scar area without having to do invasive surgery. Researchers have developed new heart imaging protocols using both MRI and CT. Their MRI protocol method can now spot both dense and scattered scar tissue. The CT protocol combines multiple different types of scans into a single appointment and uses a special scanner that captures the motion of the heart. For this study, patients will undergo CT and MRI imaging according to these new imaging protocols. With this study, researchers aim to show that these new imaging protocols can be undergone by patients with ventricular tachycardia and can be used to identify scar. Researchers will also use these scans to make radiation treatment plans to identify which types of treatment can be delivered safely to patients.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCT and MRI

All participants will undergo both CT imaging and MRI imaging to identify areas of ischemic scar. Treatment plans will be created based on CT scans, for all participants using various treatment delivery and motion management techniques.

Sponsors

Stewart Gaede
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ischemic cardiomyopathy with monomorphic VT * Referred by cardiologists * 18 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

* • Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia * Ventricular fibrillation * Pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study * Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73m2 * Previous allergic reaction to CT contrast agent Note that participants with contraindications for MRI can still be enrolled in this study but will not undergo MRI parts of this protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement among cardiologists for target regions, assessed by an inter- and intra-observer variability study using similarity metrics such as the Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance.6 months after conclusion of studyImaging protocols will be delivered to participants. Targets will be delineated by experts. Agreement between experts will be assessed..
Adherence of treatment plans to dose constraints and deliverability of treatment plans.6 months after conclusion of studyTreatment plans will be created using various motion management and radiation treatment delivery strategies. Adherence of treatment plans to dose constraints will be assessed by comparing treatment plans to institutional dose constraints. Beam deliverability will be assessed by delivering the treatment plan to a static phantom and comparing the deposited dose to the expected dose. Treatment deliverability, as it relates to motion management, will be assessed by delivering the treatment plan to a moving phantom and comparing the deposited dose to the expected dose.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Agreement between CT/MRI areas of interest (scar), assessed using similarity metrics such as the Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance.6 months after conclusion of study

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactStewart Gaede, PhD
stewart.gaede@lhsc.on.ca519-685-8600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026