Skip to content

Coblation Tonsillotomy Versus Radiofrequency and Cold Knife Dissection Tonsillectomy

Intracapsular Coblation Tonsillotomy Versus Extracapsular Radiofrequency and Cold Knife Dissection Tonsillectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06937762
Enrollment
72
Registered
2025-04-22
Start date
2025-04-20
Completion date
2025-09-15
Last updated
2026-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Tonsillitis

Brief summary

This study aims to assess and compare the outcomes between coblation intracapsular tonsillotomy versus extracapsular Radiofrequency and cold knife dissection tonsillectomy efficacy in managing patients requiring tonsil surgery as regards (time of operation, Intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, postoperative bleeding, complications, tonsillar fossa healing)

Interventions

DEVICEIntra capsular coblation tonsillotomy

Tonsils were dissected from the surface inward with the wand set at Coblate 7 setting. The wand skims the tonsil surface with continuous saline irrigation. Ablation was performed without penetrating the tonsillar capsule. Retraction of the tonsillar pillars is done to define the margins for near complete ablation. When the capsule is approached, the wand is turned down to Coblate 3 setting. Thin layer of tonsillar tissue is left to protect the capsule. Bleeding does not occur in most cases, but when it occurs, the wand was used in the Coagulate 5 setting for homeostasis

DEVICEExtracapsular cold knife dissection tonsillectomy

Begin by retracting the anterior tonsillar pillar to expose the tonsil, use a cold knife (scalpel or tonsil dissector) to make an incision along the anterior pillar near the mucosal margin of the tonsil, identify the plane between the tonsillar capsule and the underlying pharyngeal muscle, then carefully dissect the tonsil away from the surrounding tissues, following the plane to avoid trauma to the underlying structures, proceed from the superior pole of the tonsil to the inferior pole, ensuring that the entire tonsil is removed, use gauze or sponges to control minor bleeding during the procedure, for more significant bleeding, apply direct pressure or use ligatures and cold packs, achieve final hemostasis using absorbable sutures or electrocautery if needed

DEVICEExtra capsular Radiofrequency tonsillectomy

Radiofrequency bipolar forceps, connected to a radiofrequency apparatus model Ellman Surgitron 4 MHz (Ellman International, New York, USA) by which cutting and dissection with coagulation were done in the same time with minimal diffuse heating to the surrounding tissue. The power was adjusted to a power grade 40 in a bipolar mode.

Sponsors

Kafrelsheikh University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Recurrent Acute tonsillitis Tonsillitis resulting in febrile convulsions Enlarged tonsils that cause upper airway obstruction, dysphagia, sleep disorders Chronic tonsillitis Chronic or recurrent tonsillitis in a streptococcal carrier not responding to beta-lactamase-resistant antibiotics

Exclusion criteria

Patients with known bleeding disorders Acute infections of tonsil Contraindications for general anesthesia Anemia Patients unwilling or unable to give informed consent were excluded from this study patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
comparision of the severity of postoperative pain between the three groups.The first time on day 1, the second time on day 3 and third time on day 71- Postoperative pain will be assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 20, 2026