Skip to content

Comparison Between Arthrocentesis and Rocabado Exercises on Temporomandibular Disc Displacement Without Reduction

Arthrocentesis Versus Rocabado Exercises on Temporomandibular Disc Displacement Without Reduction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06937151
Enrollment
68
Registered
2025-04-22
Start date
2022-09-03
Completion date
2024-05-02
Last updated
2025-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Articular Disc Disorder (Reducing or Non-Reducing)

Keywords

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Brief summary

The present study will be designed to compare the short- and medium-term results of arthrocentesis and non-surgical methods Rocabado approach in early disc displacement without reduction.

Detailed description

This study will be designed to provide a comparison between the effect of the Rocabado approach as a conservative treatment and temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis in temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction. Delimitations: This study will be delimited in the following aspects: 1. Patients: The study group will be composed of sixty-eight patients with temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction will be enrolled in the study. Group A: It will be composed of thirty-four patients with TMJ disc displacement without reduction who are started on the Rocabado approach- 4 - 6×6 exercise program. Include therapeutic exercise, and patient education focusing on the temporomandibular joint. Repeat measurements will be performed on 1st measurement at the baseline before any intervention, 2nd measurement after 8 weeks of treatment by a physiotherapist. Group B: It will be composed of thirty-four patients with disc displacement without reduction who are started on TMJ arthrocentesis procedure with medical and nursing care. 2. Equipment and tools: 2.1-Measurement equipment: Thera bite ROM scale 8-Item Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS-8) (Valid Arabic version) visual anlogue scale 2.2-Therapeutic procedures: Rocabado's 6X6 Exercise Program and manibulation

Interventions

PROCEDURERocabado approach exercise program 6×6 and manibulation .

Rocabado's approach (Rocabado's 6 × 6 Exercises and manipulation). This program included 6 exercises to be performed 6 times a day, repeated 6 times, and three gliding exercises.

Participants in the Control Group underwent arthrocentesis of the affected temporomandibular joint. The procedure was performed as follows: Anesthesia: Local anesthesia was administered to the area surrounding the TMJ. Needle Insertion: A 20-gauge needle was inserted into the upper joint space approximately 10 mm anterior to the tragus. Lavage: The joint was lavaged with lactated Ringer's solution to reduce inflammation and remove debris. The joint was irrigated with lactated Ringer's solution.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* History of a sudden reduction in the mandibular opening. Unassisted mandibular opening 35 mm. * Mandibular opening with assistance increased by ≥3 mm from * unassisted opening, with a prior history of click, click disappearance, and a sudden decrease in opening. * Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of Disc displacement without reduction. * Persistence of the symptoms indicated in the first item for a Maximum of 3 weeks. * clinical diagnosis of unilateral Disc displacement without reduction of the temporomandibular joint.

Exclusion criteria

* History of major jaw trauma. * Dentofacial deformity. * Psychiatric illness. * Chronic headache. Presence of other disorders involving the TMJ.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thera Bite RANGE OF MOTION scalepre treatment and eight weeks post treatmentWill be used for measuring the Maximal interincisal opening, lateral movement will be measured. Measuring Maximal Interincisal Opening : 1. Patient Positioning: The patient opens their mouth as wide as possible without discomfort. 2. Scale Placement: The range of motion scale is positioned so that the notch rests on the edge of the lower incisor. 3. Measurement: Rotate the scale until it contacts the upper incisor, and record the reading at the point of contact. Measuring Lateral Excursion Movement: 1. Scale Alignment: Rest the range of motion scale against the lower incisors with the upper and lower teeth closed together. 2. Arrow Alignment: Align the arrow on the scale with an interproximal space between two upper teeth. 3. Measurement: Move the mandible laterally (side-to-side) and record the measurements on the lateral side.
8-Items Jaw Functional Limitation Scalepre treatment and eight weeks post treatmentDisability related to orofacial pain, which makes it a generic tool that one can use it for different types of orofacial pain conditions. 1. Preparation: Select a quiet and distraction-free environment. 2. Understanding the Scale: Rate each item on a scale from 0 (no limitation) to 10 (severe limitation). 3. Completing the Questionnaire: Carefully read each question and reflect on your jaw function over the past week. 4. Items to Rate: Assess difficulties in chewing, mouth opening, and emotional expression. 5. Time Required: Completion typically takes less than 5 minutes. 6. Post-Completion: Higher scores indicate greater functional limitations.
Visual analog scalepre treatment and eight weeks post treatmentOne of the pain rating scales, 1. Preparation: Ensure the VISUAL ANALOG SCALE line is accurately printed to scale (10 cm) with endpoints labeled: * 0 = No pain. * 10 = Worst imaginable pain. 2. Patient Instructions: Ask the patient to mark their current pain level on the line. 3. Score Measurement and Interpretation: Measure the distance in centimeters from the no pain end (0) to the patient's mark to determine the score out of 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity (e.g., a mark at 6 cm corresponds to a pain level of 6/10). 4. Recall Period: Patients report either their current pain or pain experienced within the last 24 hours, depending on assessment context.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026