Skip to content

The Impact of an Art and Philosophy-based Intervention on Children's Eco-anxiety

The Impact of an Art and Philosophy-based Intervention on Children's Eco-anxiety: A Pilot Study

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06937021
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2025-04-20
Start date
2023-02-03
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eco-anxiety, Hope, Mental Health, Psychological Distress, Tolerance to Distress

Keywords

Art-based interventions, Philosophical inquiry, eco-anxiety, children, schools, mental health

Brief summary

Objective: To examine the impact of climate change on children's mental health by comparing the effectiveness of an arts only intervention (ABI) and an arts and philosophy-based intervention (APBI) on children's eco-anxiety, tolerance to distress and hope for the future in school settings. The investigators hypothesized that the children assigned to the combined arts and philosophy intervention would show reductions in self-reported eco-anxiety, as well as increases in tolerance to distress and hope for the future in the context of climate change, when compared to children assigned to the arts-only intervention. Setting: This study is conducted in public primary schools from England. Participants: Participants are students in grades 3 to 6. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome is self-reported eco-anxiety scores. Secondary outcomes are self-reported tolerance to distress, hope for the future and mental health (depression and anxiety symptoms).

Interventions

OTHERArt and philosophy intervention (APBI)

8 session intervention delivered during school time. Each session involves an art activity with a corresponding philosophical discussion.

OTHERArt based intervention (ABI)

A 8 session intervention delivered during school time. Each session involve a creative arts activity.

Sponsors

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Bishop's University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* being an elementary school student

Exclusion criteria

* not being an elementary school student

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eco-anxietyFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksSelf-reported child eco-anxiety Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 33 Higher scores mean worse outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tolerance to distressFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksSelf-reported child tolerance to distress Distress Intolerance Index for Youth Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 36 Higher scores mean worse outcomes
HopeFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksSelf-reported child hope 1 item house scale: Thinking about climate change, how hopeful would you say you are that things will get better in the future? Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 4 Higher score means a better outcome
Mental healthFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeksSelf-reported anxiety and depression symptoms Selected items from the anxiety and depression subscales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children-III Minimum score: 0 Maximum score anxiety: 9 Maximum score depression: 15 Higher scores mean a worse outcome

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026