Skip to content

Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin and Advanced Platelet-rich Fibrin With Xenograft on the Socket Preservation of Mandibular Extracted Molars

Comparison of the Effect of Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin and Advanced Platelet-rich Fibrin With Xenograft on the Socket Preservation of Mandibular Extracted Molars ( a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial) Comparison of the Effect of Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin and Advanced Platelet-rich Fibrin With Xenograft on the Socket Preservation of Mandibular Extracted Molars ( a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06936358
Enrollment
16
Registered
2025-04-20
Start date
2023-08-22
Completion date
2024-12-17
Last updated
2025-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Extraction, Socket Preservation

Brief summary

Different materials and techniques are employed for socket preservation to reduce the alveolar bone resorption in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions as well as the soft tissue collapse after tooth extraction. Because of the repair abilities of the growth factors and proteins released by platelets, the development and application of platelet-enriched preparations have revolutionised the area of regenerative medicine.The present study will be designed to study the difference between A-PRF and IPRF with the addition of Xenograft in the preservation of bone in mandibular molars.

Interventions

OTHERControl

Control group received bone graft alone after extraction

OTHERA-PRF

30 mL of whole venous blood will be withdrawn from the antecubital vein via scalp vein catheter centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 14 minutes.

OTHERI-PRF

30 mL of whole venous blood will be withdrawn from the antecubital vein via scalp vein catheter centrifuged at 700 rpm for 3 minutes

Sponsors

Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who need extraction of hopeless mandibular molars * Teeth with advanced caries not amenable for conservative treatment * Patients who are willing and fully capable of complying with the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic diseases that prevent surgery * Acute or chronic oral infections * Periodontal diseases * Heavy smokers or alcoholics * On anticoagulant drugs. * Pregnancy * History of radiotherapy or chemotherapy of the head and neck region

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in healingBaseline and 12 weeksA modified Landry, Turnbull, and Howley healing index will be used to assess wound healing (HI). This entails evaluating the following parameters in a comparative manner using a dichotomic score (1/0). Tissue colour or the presence or absence of redness to indicate inflammatory processes; granulation tissue; suppuration; swelling; degree of tissue epithelialisation (partial or complete); and the presence or absence of bleeding and tenderness on palpation
change in bone densityBaseline and 12 weeksBone density will be measured using CBCT examinations

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026