Bone Loss, Regenerative Inflammation, Third Molars Extraction
Conditions
Brief summary
The general objective of this split-mouth study is to analyze the osteogenic action of BTCP during the bone regeneration process following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Detailed description
The proposed protocol is a multicenter clinical trial aimed at analyzing the osteogenic action of a medical device based on beta-tricalcium phosphate (hereinafter BTCP) in the bone regeneration process following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. The specific objectives of the study include a comparative analysis of clinical and radiological variables between a control group and a study group. Inclusion criteria for study subjects include being of legal age, providing informed consent, and requiring the extraction of both impacted mandibular third molars, among others. Exclusion criteria include the presence of severe mental disorders or medical contraindications for tooth extraction. The study involves a total of 60 third molars from 30 patients, divided into a control group and a study group. Data will be collected regarding patient demographics, the surgical procedure, and the bone regeneration assessment. The surgical procedure involves selecting patients with similarly complex third molars, followed by tooth extraction and the placement of BTCP in the study group or a standard material in the control group. Clinical follow-up will be conducted during the first 7 days, and radiological follow-up will take place over the following 6 months to evaluate bone regeneration. Patients will receive compensation for their participation in the study, which includes medical consultations, phone follow-ups, examination time, completion of questionnaires, and training in self-assessment.
Interventions
COMBINATION_PRODUCTMedical device: beta-tricalcium phosphate
The description of the intervention for BTCP in the study involves the application of this substance to promote bone regeneration following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. BTCP is indicated for the treatment of segmental and cavitary bone loss, aesthetic repairs, and bone augmentations (such as inlay or onlay grafts); for filling dental alveolar bone; for dental implant placement; and for the stabilization of osteotomies and prostheses in dentistry.
The intervention description for Bio-Oss in the study involves the application of this standard material to promote bone regeneration following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Bio-Oss is a commonly used xenograft material known for its osteoconductive properties.
Sponsors
Universidad de Murcia
Nueva Galimplant SLU
Mario Pérez Sayáns
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients must be of legal age, generally defined as 18 years or older, to be able to provide adequate informed consent and understand the risks and benefits of the procedure. * Informed Consent: Patients must be willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the study, indicating their understanding and acceptance of the associated procedures and risks. * Need for Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: Patients must require the extraction of both impacted mandibular third molars to be eligible for the study. * Similar Complexity of Impacted Third Molars: The impacted mandibular third molars must present similar complexity for extraction on both sides of the jaw, to ensure a fair comparison between the study groups. * Absence of Medical Contraindications for Oral Surgical Procedures: Patients must not have significant medical contraindications that would prevent oral surgical procedures, such as clotting disorders, uncontrolled systemic diseases, or a history of severe infections.
Exclusion criteria
* Severe Mental Disorders: Patients with severe mental disorders that may affect their ability to understand and follow study instructions may be excluded due to concerns about their capacity to provide valid informed consent and follow the study protocol. * Contraindications for Dental Extractions: Patients with specific contraindications for dental extraction, such as a history of osteonecrosis of the jaws or serious complications associated with previous dental procedures, may be excluded for safety reasons. * Patients under the age of 18 will not be eligible to participate in the study due to ethical and legal concerns related to obtaining informed consent and the ability to understand the risks and benefits of the study. Withdrawal from the Study: -If a patient experiences severe complications during the study, such as severe postoperative infections, severe allergic reactions, or any other adverse event that may jeopardize their health, they will be considered for withdrawal from the study to ensure their well-being. Additionally, if a patient decides to voluntarily withdraw from the study at any time, their decision will be respected, and appropriate medical care will be provided as needed.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Bone Regeneration_Reduction in radiolucent volume | A) Immediately after extraction B) 1 month. C) 3 months. D) 6 months | This outcome measure involves assessing the degree of bone regeneration in the extraction socket following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. It will be evaluated through radiological imaging using CBCT scans at specified time points, including immediately post-extraction, at one month, three months, and six months post-extraction. Reduction in radiolucent volume within the extraction socket, indicating new bone formation (Hounsfield unit (HU)). High values mean more radiopacity and better regeneration. |
| Bone Regeneration_bone volume | A) Immediately after extraction B) 1 month. C) 3 months. D) 6 months | This outcome measure involves assessing the degree of bone regeneration in the extraction socket following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. It will be evaluated through radiological imaging using CBCT scans at specified time points, including immediately post-extraction, at one month, three months, and six months post-extraction. Evaluation of bone volume within the extraction site over time (mm3). The increase in bone volume means better regeneration |
| Bone Regeneration_bone density | A) Immediately after extraction B) 1 month. C) 3 months. D) 6 months | This outcome measure involves assessing the degree of bone regeneration in the extraction socket following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. It will be evaluated through radiological imaging using CBCT scans at specified time points, including immediately post-extraction, at one month, three months, and six months post-extraction. Changes in bone density within the regenerated bone tissue (Hounsfield unit (HU)) High values mean more radiopacity and better regeneration. |
| Bone Regeneration_Fractal dimension | A) Immediately after extraction B) 1 month. C) 3 months. D) 6 months | This outcome measure involves assessing the degree of bone regeneration in the extraction socket following the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. It will be evaluated through radiological imaging using CBCT scans at specified time points, including immediately post-extraction, at one month, three months, and six months post-extraction. Evaluation of bone morphology within the extraction site over time analyzing the fractal dimension (FD) FD can vary between 1 and 2, with 1 being a very simple fractal dimension (such as a straight line) and 2 being a more complex fractal dimension (such as a completely irregular surface) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain levels through visual analog scale | 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days | Assessment of pain experienced by participants using a visual analog scale (VAS) at various time points post-extraction. It comprehends values between 0-10, where 10 is the worst situation. |
| Clinical Inflammation evaluating by presence/absence | 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days | Evaluation of postoperative inflammation around the extraction site using clinical examination and assessment tools (presence/absence). The presence of inflammation means the worst prognosis. |
| Healing measured by healing index | 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days | The healing progress will be assessed using the Healing Index (HI) developed by Hamzani & Chaushu (2018) and Landry (1988). The HI score ranges from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates poor healing and 5 indicates excellent healing. To ensure consistency and reliability in the assessment of healing, two independent researchers will evaluate the healing progress for all participants. The level of agreement between the researchers will be assessed using Cohen's Kappa index (Mandrekar, 2011). A Cohen's Kappa index value of 0.91 was achieved for the assessment of inflammation level, indicating a high degree of agreement. Similarly, agreement levels exceeding 0.90 were obtained across all HI levels, demonstrating a high level of concordance in the assessment of healing progress. |
| Post-surgical complications evaluated by presence or absense | 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days | Monitoring and recording of any complications following the extraction procedure, such as alveolitis, trismus, infection, and hematoma (presence/absence). The presence of complications is related to a worse prognosis. |
| Oral Health-related Quality of Life measured by OHIP-14 test | 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days | Assessment of the impact of treatment on patients' quality of life using validated instruments (OHIP-14). The higher the average value of the seven dimensions, the more negative the impact of oral health on the quality of life of an individual.Minimum of 0 points and maximum of 56 points. Lower scores: They indicate that the person experiences less impact of oral health problems on their quality of life. That is, they have fewer problems or feel less the impact of these problems in their daily lives. Intermediate scores: Suggest a moderate impact of oral health problems on quality of life. The person may experience some difficulties or discomfort related to their oral health, but they do not necessarily significantly affect their daily functioning. Higher scores: Indicate a significant impact of oral health problems on quality of life. The person may experience a wide range of problems that affect their general well-being, including pain, eating difficulties, sleep problems, etc. |
Countries
Spain
Contacts
Primary ContactMARIO PEREZ-SAYANS GARCIA, PHD, PHD
Outcome results
None listed