Skip to content

Surveillance Versus Bronchoscopy After Airway Stenting

Surveillance Versus Prn bronChOscoPy aftEr aIrway stenTing (SCOPE-IT)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06935695
Acronym
SCOPE-IT
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-04-20
Start date
2025-01-01
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2025-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchial Stents

Keywords

Airway, Stent, Bronchoscopy, Surveillance

Brief summary

Randomized, pilot study that evaluates surveillance bronchoscopy versus no surveillance for patients that undergo tracheobronchial stenting

Interventions

DEVICEBronchoscopy

Bronchoscopy is a procedure that uses a bronchoscope (a thin, tube-like instrument with a light and a lens for viewing) to examine the inside of the trachea, bronchi (air passages that lead to the lungs), and lungs. The bronchoscope is inserted through the nose or mouth.

Sponsors

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients that undergo central airway (trachea, main stem bronchi and bronchus intermedius) stenting.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to obtain informed consent due to cognitive, neurologic or psychiatric impairment. * Lobar or segmental stents alone * Terminally ill patients considered too sick to undergo a follow-up surveillance bronchoscopy * Stent insertion as a trial for excessive central airway collapse (as the duration of these stents is only 1-2 weeks) * Patients with a tracheostomy (as these patients can undergo frequent in-line suctioning that can affect the outcomes being assessed)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of stent-related complications warranting an intervention3 months after enrollmentPossible complications: Stent migration, biofilm formation, obstructive mucus plugging, obstructive granulation requiring intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of hospitalizations due to stent-related complications3 months after enrollmentNumber of hospitalizations due to stent-related complications
Number of unscheduled visits due to stent-related complications3 months after enrollmentNumber of unscheduled visits due to stent-related complications
Number of urgent care or emergency room visits due to stent-related complications3 months after enrollmentNumber of urgent care or emergency room visits due to stent-related complications
Number of stent-related complications as detected during a bronchoscopy or on cross-sectional imaging3 months after enrollmentNumber of stent-related complications as detected during a bronchoscopy or on cross-sectional imaging
Protocol Feasibility Composite Score3 months after enrollmentA composite score comprised from recruitment success (enrollment of target participant numbers), protocol adherence, data completeness, intervention safety, and resource availability to measure protocol feasibility. The total scale for the composite score is 1 to 5, with higher score indicating more feasibility.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAxel Duval, MD
axel.duval@mountsinai.org‭(212) 824-8546‬

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026