Skip to content

A Study to Learn How Safe and How Well Linvoseltamab Works Compared to Standard Treatment in Adult Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Not Eligible for Transplant

A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Phase 3 Study of Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Induction Followed by Linvoseltamab Versus Continued Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Transplant Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06932562
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2025-04-17
Start date
2025-12-23
Completion date
2036-12-01
Last updated
2026-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma (MM), Transplant ineligible, Newly diagnosed, Linvoseltamab, BCMA X CD3 bispecific antibody, CD38 antibody, Lenalidomide

Brief summary

This study is researching an experimental drug called linvoseltamab. The study is focused on participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (transplant-ineligible). The main purpose of this study is to compare the effect and safety of linvoseltamab with the effect and safety of the standard treatment.

Interventions

DRUGLinvoseltamab

Administered per the protocol

DRUGDaratumumab

Administered per the protocol

DRUGLenalidomide

Administered per the protocol

DRUGDexamethasone

Administered per the protocol

Sponsors

European Myeloma Network B.V.
Lead SponsorNETWORK
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants must have confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic MM per IMWG criteria. 2. Participants must not be considered a candidate for high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and ASCT, as described in the protocol. 3. Participants must have measurable disease as defined in the protocol. 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2. 5. Participants must have clinical laboratory values within a prespecified range.

Exclusion criteria

1. International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index of 2 with the exception of participants who have a score of 2 based on age alone. 2. Participants who defer transplant due to personal preference. 3. Participants with non-secretory MM, active plasma cell leukemia, known light-chain (AL) amyloidosis in the presence of a concurrent diagnosis of myeloma, any other form of amyloidosis, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or known POEMS syndrome. 4. Any prior therapy for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), or MM, with the exception of: * focal radiation and/or * a short course of corticosteroids as defined in the protocol. 5. Participants who have received or are receiving any investigational agent or cell therapy with known or suspected activity against MM 6. Participants who have known central nervous system (CNS) or meningeal involvement with MM or known or suspected progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a history of a neurocognitive condition or CNS movement disorder, OR a history of seizure, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke or seizure within 12 months prior to study C1D1. 7. Participants who have uncontrolled intercurrent illness. 8. Known contraindications to the use of daratumumab or lenalidomide per local prescribing information. 9. History of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or solid organ transplant at any time. NOTE Other protocol defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)up to 11 yearsMinimal Residual Disease (MRD) negative Complete Remission (CR) status at 10\^-5 per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria
MRD negative CR status by BICRup to 11 yearsMRD negative CR status at 10\^-5 as determined by the Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) per IMWG criteriaup to 11 yearsdefined as the time from the date of randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier, where disease progression is determined per IMWG criteria.
PFS as determined by BICRup to 11 yearsdefined as the time from the date of randomization until the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs earlier, where disease progression is determined per by BICR.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)up to 11 yearsOverall Survival (OS), measured from the date of from randomization to the date the subject's death
Objective Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR)up to 11 yearsTo compare the proportion of patients who achieve an objective response per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria between the two study arms for Complete Response (CR) or better
OR of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)up to 11 yearsTo compare the proportion of patients who achieve an objective response per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria between the two study arms for VGPR or better
OR of Partial Response (PR)up to 11 yearsTo compare the proportion of patients who achieve an objective response per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria between the two study arms for PR or better
Sustained MRDup to 11 yearsSustained MRD negative CR (sMRD) at 10\^-5 per IMWG criteria
Duration of response (DOR) of stringent (s)CRup to 11 yearsduration of response to best overall response of stringent sCR, per IMWG response criteria
Duration of response (DOR) of CRup to 11 yearsduration of response to best overall response of CR, per IMWG response criteria
Duration of response (DOR) of VGPRup to 11 yearsduration of response to best overall response of VGPR, per IMWG response criteria
Duration of response (DOR) of PRup to 11 yearsduration of response to best overall response of PR, per IMWG response criteria
Time to response ≥CRup to 11 yearsTime from randomization to objective response (≥CR) as per IMWG response criteria
Time to response ≥VGPRup to 11 yearsTime from randomization to objective response (≥VGPR) as per IMWG response criteria
Time to response ≥PRup to 11 yearsTime from randomization to objective response (≥PR) as per IMWG response criteria
Disease progressionup to 11 yearsTime to disease progression per IMWG response criteria
Incidence of TEAEsup to 11 yearsIncidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
Severity of TEAEsup to 11 yearsSeverity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
Serious Adverse Eventsup to 11 yearsIncidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Concentrations of linvoseltamabup to 11 yearsConcentrations of linvoseltamab in serum over time
Incidence antidrug antibodiesup to 11 yearsIncidence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to linvoseltamab
Titer of ADAup to 11 yearsTiter of ADA to linvoseltamab
EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status / Quality of Lifeup to 11 yearsChange in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item validated questionnaire developed to measure patient-reported quality of life using one global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) scale, 5 functioning scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social) ranging from from 1 = "very poor" to 7 = "excellent" and 9 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties) among patients with cancer, ranging from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden.
EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (PF)up to 11 yearsChange in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire functioning scale Physical Functioning (PF). PF scale consist of 5 items, ranging from from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher ("better") level of functioning
EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning (RF)up to 11 yearsChange in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire functioning scale Role Functioning (RF). RF scale consist of 2 items, ranging from from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher ("better") level of functioning
EORTC QLQ-C30 Painup to 11 yearsChange in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire symptom scale Pain. Pain scale consist of 2 items, ranging from from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden
EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigueup to 11 yearsChange in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire symptom scale Fatigue. Fatigue scale consist of 3 items, ranging from from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much" higher scores indicate higher symptom burden
EQ-5D-5L VASup to 11 yearsChange in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions, 5-level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS) (EQ-5D-5L VAS). The EQ-5D-5L is a generic questionnaire that measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) across 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) across 5 levels (1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= some problems, 4= severe problems and 5= extreme problems), higher scores indicate lower health states And a visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS scale ranging from 0 = "worst" to 100 = "best" higher score indicate higher health status

Countries

Australia, Austria, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTSilvia Villa
silvia.villa@emn.org+31 10 268 70 65
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRoberto Mina

A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORClaudia Stege

Erasmus Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026