Skip to content

Integration and Interactions Between Visual and Proprioceptive Feedbacks

Study of the Integration and Interactions Between Visual and Proprioceptive Feedbacks in Hemiplegic Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06931509
Acronym
OptiVis
Enrollment
38
Registered
2025-04-17
Start date
2025-11-25
Completion date
2029-11-30
Last updated
2026-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiparetic Stroke

Keywords

Computerize mirror, Vibration, Upper limb rehabilitation, Stroke, hemiplegic

Brief summary

Mental imagery is a rehabilitation technique for stroke patients, involving the mental representation of movement. Recent technical advancements have enabled the use of visual, proprioceptive, and mixed feedback to enhance motor stimulation. Currently, all post-stroke patients receive these techniques indiscriminately. This study aims to demonstrate differences in the integration of visual and proprioceptive feedback in stroke patients and understand the determinants based on the affected brain area. Patients with motor disabilities will perform motor imagery tasks with various feedback types while their cortical activity is recorded using EEG. EEG data for each type of feedback will be correlated with the lesion area in order to better understand the ongoing mechanisms.

Interventions

DEVICEComputerized mirror therapy (IVS3) + Tendon vibration (Vibramoov)

Visit 1 : Followed by 30 movements of Paretic arm wrist extension with 4 randomized experimental conditions (Vision alone, Vibration alone, Vision + Vibration, No feedback), with EEG monitoring. Measurement of movement perception feeling for each condition. Visit 2 : 30 movements of Paretic arm wrist extension with 4 randomized experimental conditions (Vision alone, Vibration alone, Vision + Vibration, No feedback), with EEG monitoring. Measurement of movement perception feeling for each condition.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hemiplegic subjects : Male or female, aged 18 to 80 years, first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, having signed the written consent and affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cognitive impairment, severe Aphasia or severe neglect that impair ability to understand instructions or to execute tasks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EEG beta desynchronizationDay 1Differences in the EEG beta desynchronization over motor-cortex across the types of feedbacks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alpha BandDay 1Alpha Band desynchronization over motor cortex
Occipital alpha bandDay 1Occipital alpha band modulations
Beta reboundDay 1Beta rebound (Event related synchronization)
Parietal beta-bandDay 1Parietal beta-band desynchronization
Perception of movementsDay 1The intensity of the perception of movements using a visual analogue scale and the objective measurement of perceived movement angle reproduced by the healthy hand's and Visual analogic scale

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTDiana Rimaud, doctor of science
Diana.Rimaud@chu-st-etienne.fr0477120467
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPascal GIRAUX, Md

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 25, 2026